From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Finlye Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
tony.xie@rock-chips.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
dianders@chromium.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wbriannorris@chromium.org,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, jay.xu@rock-chips.com,
cl@rock-chips.com, wxt@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] nvmem: rockchip-efuse: add rk3399-efuse support
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9095543.Jj9CjkY9P4@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470811843-42668-5-git-send-email-finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>
Hi Finley,
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016, 14:50:43 schrieb Finlye Xiao:
> From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>
>
> 1) the efuse timing of rk3399 is different from earlier SoCs.
> 2) rk3399-efuse is organized as 32bits by 32 one-time programmable
> electrical fuses, the efuse of earlier SoCs is organized as 32bits
> by 8 one-time programmable electrical fuses with random access interface.
>
> This patch adds a new read function for rk3399-efuse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/rockchip-efuse.c | 132
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 112
> insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/rockchip-efuse.c b/drivers/nvmem/rockchip-efuse.c
> index 4d3f391..58fee00b 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/rockchip-efuse.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/rockchip-efuse.c
> @@ -22,17 +22,28 @@
> #include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> -#define EFUSE_A_SHIFT 6
> -#define EFUSE_A_MASK 0x3ff
> -#define EFUSE_PGENB BIT(3)
> -#define EFUSE_LOAD BIT(2)
> -#define EFUSE_STROBE BIT(1)
> -#define EFUSE_CSB BIT(0)
> -
> -#define REG_EFUSE_CTRL 0x0000
> -#define REG_EFUSE_DOUT 0x0004
> +#define RK3288_A_SHIFT 6
> +#define RK3288_A_MASK 0x3ff
> +#define RK3288_PGENB BIT(3)
> +#define RK3288_LOAD BIT(2)
> +#define RK3288_STROBE BIT(1)
> +#define RK3288_CSB BIT(0)
> +
> +#define RK3399_A_SHIFT 16
> +#define RK3399_A_MASK 0x3ff
> +#define RK3399_NBYTES 4
> +#define RK3399_STROBSFTSEL BIT(9)
> +#define RK3399_PD BIT(5)
> +#define RK3399_PGENB BIT(3)
> +#define RK3399_LOAD BIT(2)
> +#define RK3399_STROBE BIT(1)
> +#define RK3399_CSB BIT(0)
> +
> +#define REG_EFUSE_CTRL 0x0000
> +#define REG_EFUSE_DOUT 0x0004
>
> struct rockchip_efuse_chip {
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -40,8 +51,8 @@ struct rockchip_efuse_chip {
> struct clk *clk;
> };
>
> -static int rockchip_efuse_read(void *context, unsigned int offset,
> - void *val, size_t bytes)
> +static int rockchip_rk3288_efuse_read(void *context, unsigned int offset,
> + void *val, size_t bytes)
> {
> struct rockchip_efuse_chip *efuse = context;
> u8 *buf = val;
> @@ -53,27 +64,78 @@ static int rockchip_efuse_read(void *context, unsigned
> int offset, return ret;
> }
>
> - writel(EFUSE_LOAD | EFUSE_PGENB, efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> + writel(RK3288_LOAD | RK3288_PGENB, efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> udelay(1);
> while (bytes--) {
> writel(readl(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL) &
> - (~(EFUSE_A_MASK << EFUSE_A_SHIFT)),
> + (~(RK3288_A_MASK << RK3288_A_SHIFT)),
> efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> writel(readl(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL) |
> - ((offset++ & EFUSE_A_MASK) << EFUSE_A_SHIFT),
> + ((offset++ & RK3288_A_MASK) << RK3288_A_SHIFT),
> efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> udelay(1);
> writel(readl(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL) |
> - EFUSE_STROBE, efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> + RK3288_STROBE, efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> udelay(1);
> *buf++ = readb(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_DOUT);
> writel(readl(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL) &
> - (~EFUSE_STROBE), efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> + (~RK3288_STROBE), efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> udelay(1);
> }
>
> /* Switch to standby mode */
> - writel(EFUSE_PGENB | EFUSE_CSB, efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> + writel(RK3288_PGENB | RK3288_CSB, efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(efuse->clk);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_rk3399_efuse_read(void *context, unsigned int offset,
> + void *val, size_t bytes)
> +{
> + struct rockchip_efuse_chip *efuse = context;
> + unsigned int addr_start, addr_end, addr_offset, addr_len;
> + unsigned int out_value;
> + unsigned char *buf;
> + int ret, i = 0;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(efuse->clk);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(efuse->dev, "failed to prepare/enable efuse clk\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + addr_start = rounddown(offset, RK3399_NBYTES) / RK3399_NBYTES;
> + addr_end = roundup(offset + bytes, RK3399_NBYTES) / RK3399_NBYTES;
> + addr_offset = offset % RK3399_NBYTES;
> + addr_len = addr_end - addr_start;
> +
> + buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*buf) * addr_len * RK3399_NBYTES, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + writel(RK3399_LOAD | RK3399_PGENB | RK3399_STROBSFTSEL,
> + efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> + udelay(1);
> + while (addr_len--) {
> + writel(readl(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL) | RK3399_STROBE |
> + ((addr_start++ & RK3399_A_MASK) << RK3399_A_SHIFT),
> + efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> + udelay(1);
> + out_value = readl(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_DOUT);
> + writel(readl(efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL) & (~RK3399_STROBE),
> + efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> + udelay(1);
> +
> + memcpy(&buf[i], &out_value, RK3399_NBYTES);
> + i += RK3399_NBYTES;
> + }
> +
> + /* Switch to standby mode */
> + writel(RK3399_PD | RK3399_CSB, efuse->base + REG_EFUSE_CTRL);
> +
> + memcpy(val, buf + addr_offset, bytes);
> +
> + kfree(buf);
>
> clk_disable_unprepare(efuse->clk);
>
> @@ -89,7 +151,22 @@ static struct nvmem_config econfig = {
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id rockchip_efuse_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "rockchip,rockchip-efuse", },
same comment as in patch1, please keep the rockchip,rockchip-efuse around
/* deprecated but kept around for dts binding compatibility */
{
.compatible = "rockchip,rockchip-efuse",
.data = (void *)&rockchip_rk3288_efuse_read,
},
as the old compatible was released in multiple kernel releases and the
devicetree API is supposed to be (mostly) stable.
> + {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066a-efuse",
> + .data = (void *)&rockchip_rk3288_efuse_read,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-efuse",
> + .data = (void *)&rockchip_rk3288_efuse_read,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-efuse",
> + .data = (void *)&rockchip_rk3288_efuse_read,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-efuse",
> + .data = (void *)&rockchip_rk3399_efuse_read,
> + },
> { /* sentinel */},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_efuse_match);
> @@ -99,6 +176,14 @@ static int rockchip_efuse_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev) struct resource *res;
> struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> struct rockchip_efuse_chip *efuse;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + match = of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev);
> + if (!match || !match->data) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get match data\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> efuse = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct rockchip_efuse_chip),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -116,7 +201,7 @@ static int rockchip_efuse_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>
> efuse->dev = &pdev->dev;
> econfig.size = resource_size(res);
> - econfig.reg_read = rockchip_efuse_read;
> + econfig.reg_read = match->data;
> econfig.priv = efuse;
> econfig.dev = efuse->dev;
> nvmem = nvmem_register(&econfig);
> @@ -144,6 +229,13 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_efuse_driver = {
> },
> };
>
> -module_platform_driver(rockchip_efuse_driver);
> +static int __init rockchip_efuse_module_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_probe(&rockchip_efuse_driver,
> + rockchip_efuse_probe);
> +}
> +
> +subsys_initcall(rockchip_efuse_module_init);
> +
that looks like an unrelated change. Why are you converting to a
subsys_initcall? Deferred probe for the efuses should take care of any
ordering issues already.
Heiko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-10 6:50 [PATCH v1 0/4] nvmem: rockchip-efuse: support more rockchip SoCs Finlye Xiao
2016-08-10 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] nvmem: rockchip-efuse: update compatible strings for Rockchip efuse Finlye Xiao
[not found] ` <1470811843-42668-2-git-send-email-finley.xiao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-10 8:21 ` Heiko Stübner
[not found] ` <1470811843-42668-1-git-send-email-finley.xiao-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-10 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: " Finlye Xiao
2016-08-10 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: add efuse0 device node for rk3399 Finlye Xiao
2016-08-10 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] nvmem: rockchip-efuse: add rk3399-efuse support Finlye Xiao
2016-08-10 8:30 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9095543.Jj9CjkY9P4@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=finley.xiao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=huangtao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=jay.xu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tony.xie@rock-chips.com \
--cc=wbriannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).