devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] irqchip: ocelot: Add support for Luton platforms
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:38:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90bb063077a7e5a429dfbfc4dd4b6a4d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116162427.1727851-4-gregory.clement@bootlin.com>

On 2020-11-16 16:24, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> This patch extends irqchip driver for oceleot to be used with an other
> vcoreiii base platform: Luton.
> 
> Based on a larger patch from Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> index 88143c0b700c..9964800c53c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mscc-ocelot.c
> @@ -12,39 +12,115 @@
>  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> 
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY	0x10
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA		0x18
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_CLR	0x1c
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_SET	0x20
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(x)	(0x38 + 0x4 * (x))
> -#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(x)	(0x5c + 0x4 * (x))
> -
> -#define OCELOT_NR_IRQ 24
> +#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(_p, x)	(_p->reg_off_ident + 0x4 * 
> (x))
> +#define ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(_p, x)	(_p->reg_off_trigger + 0x4 * 
> (x))
> +
> +#define FLAGS_NEED_INIT_ENABLE	BIT(0)
> +#define FLAGS_FORCE_LUTON_STYLE	BIT(1)
> +#define FLAGS_HAS_TRIGGER	BIT(2)
> +
> +struct chip_props {
> +	u32 flags;
> +	u32 reg_off_sticky;
> +	u32 reg_off_ena;
> +	u32 reg_off_ena_clr;
> +	u32 reg_off_ena_set;
> +	u32 reg_off_ident;
> +	u32 reg_off_trigger;
> +	u32 reg_off_force;
> +	u32 reg_off_ena_irq0;

Do all these fields need to be u32s?

> +	u32 n_irq;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct chip_props ocelot_props = {
> +	.flags			= FLAGS_HAS_TRIGGER,
> +	.reg_off_sticky		= 0x10,
> +	.reg_off_ena		= 0x18,
> +	.reg_off_ena_clr	= 0x1c,
> +	.reg_off_ena_set	= 0x20,
> +	.reg_off_ident		= 0x38,
> +	.reg_off_trigger	= 0x5c,
> +	.reg_off_force		= 0xc,
> +	.n_irq			= 24,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct chip_props luton_props = {
> +	.flags			= FLAGS_NEED_INIT_ENABLE |
> +				  FLAGS_FORCE_LUTON_STYLE,

LUTON_STYLE doesn't quite convey the idea of what this implies.
Please use a name that actually means something (other than the
city north of London). And force what exactly?

> +	.reg_off_sticky		= 0,
> +	.reg_off_ena		= 0x4,
> +	.reg_off_ena_clr	= 0x8,
> +	.reg_off_ena_set	= 0xc,
> +	.reg_off_ident		= 0x18,
> +	.reg_off_trigger	= 0,

If this field doesn't exist (because the matching flag isn't set), don't
list it.

> +	.reg_off_force		= 0x38,
> +	.reg_off_ena_irq0	= 0x14,
> +	.n_irq			= 28,
> +};

Please split this patch in two: rework the Ocelot driver to the "new"
style in one patch, then introduce new platform in another.

> 
>  static void ocelot_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>  {
>  	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	struct irq_domain *d = data->domain;
> +	struct chip_props *p = d->host_data;
>  	struct irq_chip_type *ct = irq_data_get_chip_type(data);
>  	unsigned int mask = data->mask;
>  	u32 val;
> 
>  	irq_gc_lock(gc);
> -	val = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(0)) |
> -	      irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(1));
> -	if (!(val & mask))
> -		irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY);
> +	if (p->flags & FLAGS_HAS_TRIGGER) {
> +		val = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(p, 0)) |
> +			irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_TRIGGER(p, 1));
> +		if (!(val & mask))
> +			irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, p->reg_off_sticky);
> +	}
> 
>  	*ct->mask_cache &= ~mask;
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_SET);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, mask, p->reg_off_ena_set);
>  	irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>  }
> 
> +static void luton_irq_force(struct irq_data *data,
> +			    struct irq_chip_generic *gc,
> +			    struct chip_props *p)
> +{
> +	int off = p->reg_off_force + (data->hwirq * sizeof(u32));
> +	u32 val = irq_reg_readl(gc, off);
> +
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, val | BIT(3), off);
> +}
> +
> +static int ocelot_irq_force(struct irq_data *data,
> +			    enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool state)

Please use a name that matches the same of the API.

> +{
> +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +	struct irq_domain *d = data->domain;
> +	struct chip_props *p = d->host_data;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Only supports triggering */
> +	if ((which == IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING ||
> +	     which == IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE) &&

PENDING and ACTIVE are two very different things, and yet you handle
them the same way. Which one does your interrupt controller support?

> +	    state && p->reg_off_force) {
> +		if (p->flags & FLAGS_FORCE_LUTON_STYLE)
> +			/* Config register style */
> +			luton_irq_force(data, gc, p);
> +		else
> +			/* New, bitmask style */
> +			irq_reg_writel(gc, data->mask, p->reg_off_force);
> +		ret = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static void ocelot_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>  	struct irq_domain *d = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +	struct chip_props *p = d->host_data;
>  	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(d, 0);
> -	u32 reg = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(0));
> +	u32 reg = irq_reg_readl(gc, ICPU_CFG_INTR_DST_INTR_IDENT(p, 0));
> 
>  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> 
> @@ -58,25 +134,28 @@ static void ocelot_irq_handler(struct irq_desc 
> *desc)
>  	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>  }
> 
> -static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> -				  struct device_node *parent)
> +static int __init vcoreiii_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> +				    struct device_node *parent,
> +				    const struct chip_props *p)
>  {
>  	struct irq_domain *domain;
>  	struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>  	int parent_irq, ret;
> 
> +	pr_info("%s: Load, %d irqs\n", node->name, p->n_irq);

If you must print something, use %pOFn, just like in the rest of the 
driver.

> +
>  	parent_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
>  	if (!parent_irq)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> -	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, OCELOT_NR_IRQ,
> +	domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, p->n_irq,
>  				       &irq_generic_chip_ops, NULL);
>  	if (!domain) {
>  		pr_err("%pOFn: unable to add irq domain\n", node);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
> 
> -	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, OCELOT_NR_IRQ, 1,
> +	ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(domain, p->n_irq, 1,
>  					     "icpu", handle_level_irq,
>  					     0, 0, 0);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -92,16 +171,23 @@ static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct 
> device_node *node,
>  		goto err_gc_free;
>  	}
> 
> -	gc->chip_types[0].regs.ack = ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY;
> -	gc->chip_types[0].regs.mask = ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA_CLR;
> +	gc->chip_types[0].regs.ack = p->reg_off_sticky;
> +	gc->chip_types[0].regs.mask = p->reg_off_ena_clr;
>  	gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
>  	gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
>  	gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_unmask = ocelot_irq_unmask;
> +	gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_unmask = ocelot_irq_unmask;
> +	gc->chip_types[0].chip.irq_set_irqchip_state = ocelot_irq_force;
> 
>  	/* Mask and ack all interrupts */
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, 0, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_ENA);
> -	irq_reg_writel(gc, 0xffffffff, ICPU_CFG_INTR_INTR_STICKY);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, 0, p->reg_off_ena);
> +	irq_reg_writel(gc, 0xffffffff, p->reg_off_sticky);
> +
> +	/* Overall init */
> +	if (p->flags & FLAGS_NEED_INIT_ENABLE)
> +		irq_reg_writel(gc, BIT(0), p->reg_off_ena_irq0);
> 
> +	domain->host_data = (void *)p;

Useless cast.

>  	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(parent_irq, ocelot_irq_handler,
>  					 domain);
> 
> @@ -115,4 +201,19 @@ static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct 
> device_node *node,
> 
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +static int __init ocelot_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> +				  struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> +	return vcoreiii_irq_init(node, parent, &ocelot_props);
> +}
> +
>  IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ocelot_icpu, "mscc,ocelot-icpu-intr", 
> ocelot_irq_init);
> +
> +static int __init luton_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> +				 struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> +	return vcoreiii_irq_init(node, parent, &luton_props);
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(luton_icpu, "mscc,luton-icpu-intr", luton_irq_init);

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-16 16:24 [PATCH v3 0/5] Extend irqchip ocelot driver to support other SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2020-11-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: convert icpu intr bindings to json-schema Gregory CLEMENT
2020-11-18 20:50   ` Rob Herring
2020-11-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add binding for few Microsemi interrupt controllers Gregory CLEMENT
2020-11-18 10:35   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] irqchip: ocelot: Add support for Luton platforms Gregory CLEMENT
2020-11-18 10:45   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-18 12:38   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-11-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] irqchip: ocelot: Add support for Serval platforms Gregory CLEMENT
2020-11-18 10:46   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-11-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] irqchip: ocelot: Add support for Jaguar2 platforms Gregory CLEMENT
2020-11-18 10:46   ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90bb063077a7e5a429dfbfc4dd4b6a4d@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).