RE: [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] dt-bindings: net: Add ADIN1140

["Regus, Ciprian" <Ciprian.Regus@analog.com>]

> > +title: ADI ADIN1140 10BASE-T1S MAC-PHY
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Ciprian Regus <ciprian.regus@analog.com>
> > +
> > +description: |
> > +  The ADIN1140 (also called AD3306) is a low power single port
> 
> Can you explain what is going on here please?
> Is "adin1140" (which I can find no information easily online for) the
> exact same device as the ad3306 (which has an entry on your site)?

The adin1140 is an upcoming version of ad3306 that lacks some
(stress test) qualifications, but otherwise they are the exact same die.

> 
> > +  10BASE-T1S MAC-PHY. It integrates an Ethernet PHY with a MAC
> > +  and all the associated analog circuitry.
> > +  The device tries to implement the Open Alliance TC6 10BASE-T1x MAC-
> PHY
> > +  Serial Interface specification and is compliant with the
> > +  IEEE 802.3cg-2019 Ethernet standard for 10 Mbps single pair
> > +  Ethernet (SPE). The device has a 4-wire SPI interface for
> > +  communication between the MAC and host processor.
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - $ref: /schemas/net/ethernet-controller.yaml#
> > +  - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - adi,ad3306
> > +      - adi,adin1140
> 
> Because if they are really two names for the same part, this compatible
> setup makes no sense, as it means they have a different programming
> models.

Since they have the same programming model, should I just keep the adi,adin1140
entry?

> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>