From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov-uRwfk40T5oI@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Duplicated memory node in the Device-Tree (WAS [XEN]
 Re: Duplicated memory nodes cause the BUG())
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:08:58 +0300
Message-ID: <93878809-115f-b29e-2a8c-e18f87b1fb09@epam.com>
References: <835d808c-9d5e-2dc0-6cf9-8fbecdc49914@epam.com>
 <6d1fb061-03b0-3b58-e70a-3c0e0777d8d7@arm.com>
 <c77f71a3-edd9-3700-001b-feee05165454@epam.com>
 <7c1c8267-a065-f8ee-7e20-147d722c59be@arm.com>
 <b454b264-1f04-7446-fe0b-fafa82954353@epam.com>
 <eb0fbb83-a6de-d06e-f230-d06c615b0f88@citrix.com>
 <6e9456a3-7f0f-72e5-b4be-2bd51939d850@epam.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1707251045140.22381@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
 <041fe162-8944-5c1b-364a-940d21a3c69e@arm.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1707251109430.22381@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1707251109430.22381@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Julien Grall <julien.grall-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, xen-devel <xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu2-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Tim Deegan <tim-LM2mM/qkH7s@public.gmane.org>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson-mvvWK6WmYclDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Hello,


On 25.07.17 21:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Furthermore, if you look at the wikipage for Renesas R-Car on Xen (see [1]), a
>> specific DT for Xen is provided.
Well, we introduced a specific DT as a faster way to get the system up 
and running. But the target is to get rid of it.
Except that nasty issue with memory banks, there is another one: how to 
handle reserved memory regions needed for some IP's functionality (e.g. 
ADSP).
As I already said I do cleanup remaining nits one by one.

> That's true. It does not make sense to do this until we get rid of the
> Xen specific R-Car device tree on the wiki.
IMO, we it should appear correspondent functionality in XEN first, and 
latter get rid of specific device tree on the wiki. So that we will have 
the wiki steps adequate to the current master.

-- 

*Andrii Anisov*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html