devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: clement.leger@bootlin.com, max.zhen@amd.com,
	sonal.santan@amd.com, larry.liu@amd.com, brian.xu@amd.com,
	stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com, trix@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/3] Generate device tree node for pci devices
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 16:38:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <954cc40b-c484-5ba9-9039-eed3c1c722c3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1674183732-5157-1-git-send-email-lizhi.hou@amd.com>

Hi Clément, Hi Lizhi,

On 1/19/23 21:02, Lizhi Hou wrote:
> This patch series introduces OF overlay support for PCI devices which
> primarily addresses two use cases. First, it provides a data driven method
> to describe hardware peripherals that are present in a PCI endpoint and
> hence can be accessed by the PCI host. Second, it allows reuse of a OF
> compatible driver -- often used in SoC platforms -- in a PCI host based
> system.
> 
> There are 2 series devices rely on this patch:
> 
>   1) Xilinx Alveo Accelerator cards (FPGA based device)
>   2) Microchip LAN9662 Ethernet Controller
> 

Digging back through some history:

>      Please see: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220427094502.456111-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com/

(I am selectively pulling two fragments, see the above link for the
full email.)

Includes the following:

   A driver using this support was added and can be seen at [3]. This
   driver embeds a builtin overlay and applies it to the live tree using
   of_overlay_fdt_apply_to_node(). An interrupt driver is also included and

and

   This series was tested on a x86 kernel using CONFIG_OF under a virtual
   machine using PCI passthrough.

   Link: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YhQHqDJvahgriDZK@lunn.ch/t/
   Link: [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220408174841.34458529@fixe.home/T/
   Link: [3] https://github.com/clementleger/linux/tree/lan966x/of_support

Following link 3 to see how the driver implemented the concept, I arrived
at a git tree, with the commit be42efa "mfd: lan966x: add pci driver",
and have been looking at the code there.

Clément, is this still the best example of a driver implementation that
would use the framework proposed in the "[PATCH V7 0/3] Generate device
tree node for pci devices" patch series? And this is the driver for the
device listed as item 2 above "2) Microchip LAN9662 Ethernet Controller"?

-Frank

> 
> Normally, the PCI core discovers PCI devices and their BARs using the
> PCI enumeration process. However, the process does not provide a way to
> discover the hardware peripherals that are present in a PCI device, and
> which can be accessed through the PCI BARs. Also, the enumeration process
> does not provide a way to associate MSI-X vectors of a PCI device with the
> hardware peripherals that are present in the device. PCI device drivers
> often use header files to describe the hardware peripherals and their
> resources as there is no standard data driven way to do so. This patch
> series proposes to use flattened device tree blob to describe the
> peripherals in a data driven way. Based on previous discussion, using
> device tree overlay is the best way to unflatten the blob and populate
> platform devices. To use device tree overlay, there are three obvious
> problems that need to be resolved.
> 
> First, we need to create a base tree for non-DT system such as x86_64. A
> patch series has been submitted for this:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220624034327.2542112-1-frowand.list@gmail.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216050056.311496-1-lizhi.hou@xilinx.com/
> 
> Second, a device tree node corresponding to the PCI endpoint is required
> for overlaying the flattened device tree blob for that PCI endpoint.
> Because PCI is a self-discoverable bus, a device tree node is usually not
> created for PCI devices. This series adds support to generate a device
> tree node for a PCI device which advertises itself using PCI quirks
> infrastructure.
> 
> Third, we need to generate device tree nodes for PCI bridges since a child
> PCI endpoint may choose to have a device tree node created.
> 
> This patch series is made up of three patches.

< snip >


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-26 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-20  3:02 [PATCH V7 0/3] Generate device tree node for pci devices Lizhi Hou
2023-01-20  3:02 ` [PATCH V7 1/3] of: dynamic: Add interfaces for creating device node dynamically Lizhi Hou
2023-03-23 22:40   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-24  2:11     ` Lizhi Hou
2023-03-24 14:14       ` Rob Herring
2023-03-24 21:26         ` Lizhi Hou
2023-04-05  1:45           ` Rob Herring
2023-01-20  3:02 ` [PATCH V7 2/3] PCI: Create device tree node for selected devices Lizhi Hou
2023-01-20  3:02 ` [PATCH V7 3/3] PCI: Add PCI quirks to generate device tree node for Xilinx Alveo U50 Lizhi Hou
2023-01-23  4:32 ` [PATCH V7 0/3] Generate device tree node for pci devices Frank Rowand
2023-01-23 23:40   ` Frank Rowand
2023-02-22 15:26     ` Frank Rowand
2023-02-23  0:37       ` Lizhi Hou
2023-02-10  9:37 ` Christian Gmeiner
2023-02-26 22:38 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2023-02-27 10:22   ` Clément Léger
2023-02-27  6:51 ` Frank Rowand
2023-02-27 10:31   ` Clément Léger
2023-03-03 23:42     ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-06  8:35       ` clement.leger
2023-03-06 21:24         ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-07  0:52           ` Rob Herring
2023-03-07  7:54             ` Stefan Roese
2023-03-08  7:38               ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-07  8:47             ` Clément Léger
2023-03-08  7:29               ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-08  7:31             ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-09  8:45               ` Clément Léger
2023-03-21  8:44                 ` Christian Gmeiner
2023-03-27  3:01                   ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-29 16:50                 ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-30 15:19                   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-31 21:56                     ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-09  5:52 ` Frank Rowand
2023-03-09  5:56   ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=954cc40b-c484-5ba9-9039-eed3c1c722c3@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=brian.xu@amd.com \
    --cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=larry.liu@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
    --cc=max.zhen@amd.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sonal.santan@amd.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).