From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A09C43217 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241636AbiKRKXK (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2022 05:23:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49722 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241520AbiKRKXJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2022 05:23:09 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4305590385 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 02:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id k19so6242097lji.2 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 02:23:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SZjogBHbu6Hox+r5R773aRSxF9DDXAIJw7tfb5nqEF0=; b=RzDAHrjqmmXJRJtMDHScshl90a0ew3DPG71B897qVi1fY/6m/zKUdGnjs9pXVgIgJO BQYvB5vWlBF4kbheGuxghWw390g3RTILI6nhfPP50cYUs1vHbJvED6gL6M53PlJ8O3mm 0TrqKvi98qdenE7Eh38hiQT48iikpW0dIWAtJC7KtSWLJq3Q8xvArvcRspM+p/U/KlWn M+iyDTbty5FRR5uwKWm/SWHRd+XWrwzzxCYoljRj8U+JgF6GUWS5bDYYpL2NGfkqiZ1R 3Jc5UcJxf9cdCwctiOYKiiNanc5hdqbMHS6f3nzMBXQYGNun1ox3r1GKBsPEceq0oTCC HUDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SZjogBHbu6Hox+r5R773aRSxF9DDXAIJw7tfb5nqEF0=; b=1S1ctzDaUMsYNJX7jbv4i2MEFb6FY2U3Sd44TlYc9Gk3Lee9eI1QlV1Z2dD8hP2yrq tKjIWZcvcpINpBO/FPpPpVRI8L1VzNL4449ZNVg+jgJEK9P7wCWsDThPJ4KbFFidy3gm P4vi1HYSZjaI4bQ+on4i1LF3+saNGz2rs8GV7LU9kBsJQlZbimycmiFehqrsSeU5sKEs Jve6/D7YBOrnDcImmygSyHIl2zVrzCKto2axFgjQWWx4IsOBY3gBFnK2nSpsoFm8b9mv eTZEhfPb8ETV6k6urgKeClfNQpgzwkulkcyheXSGTaqbZbOAdxUGxzcqCeWzLC1BEtJt aw6A== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmYI0Nnl12DB56Bw79tl8FCjaxPAPCYnlMf3TZxDsHVHrPCi8Rw j+8swTsTPyJ4anUyHEctWwqyTw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4w/54HorPUxYTe6YSbQtht4ss6LQG0GXx1kPqIetT0khZ9z5aSaUDr2YgFGLtSnHscXHqFKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e63:0:b0:26e:6c5:2a6c with SMTP id t3-20020a2e8e63000000b0026e06c52a6cmr2429146ljk.36.1668766986598; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 02:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1-20020a056512070100b004b4bb6286d8sm241786lfs.84.2022.11.18.02.23.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Nov 2022 02:23:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <966aa391-8a49-c64b-9985-3d50a8c35891@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:23:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] MFD: TPS6594x: Add new PMIC device driver for TPS6594x chips Content-Language: en-US To: Matt Ranostay , vigneshr@ti.com, robh@kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it, linus.walleij@linaro.org, lee@kernel.org, brgl@bgdev.pl Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Keerthy References: <20221118092218.480147-1-mranostay@ti.com> <20221118092218.480147-3-mranostay@ti.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20221118092218.480147-3-mranostay@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 18/11/2022 10:22, Matt Ranostay wrote: > From: Keerthy > > The TPS6594x chip is a PMIC, and contains the following components: No improvements in the subject. The subject prefixes are lowercase. In the binding you said device is "TPS6594", not TPS6594x. Best regards, Krzysztof