From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: "benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"joel@jms.id.au" <joel@jms.id.au>,
"andi.shyti@kernel.org" <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"andrew@codeconstruct.com.au" <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
"p.zabel@pengutronix.de" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mo Elbadry <elbadrym@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for AST2600-i2cv2
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:21:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <994cb954-f3c4-4a44-800e-9303787c1be9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OS8PR06MB7541C3B70B15F45F4824772BF2D92@OS8PR06MB7541.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
On 19/03/2025 12:12, Ryan Chen wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for
>> AST2600-i2cv2
>>
>> On 17/03/2025 10:21, Ryan Chen wrote:
>>>> Neither this.
>>>>
>>>> So it seems you describe already existing and documented I2C, but for
>>>> some reason you want second compatible. The problem is that you do
>>>> not provide reason from the point of view of bindings.
>>>>
>>>> To summarize: what your users want - don't care. Start properly
>>>> describing hardware and your SoC.
>>>
>>> OK, for ast2600 i2c controller have two register mode setting.
>>> One, I call it is old register setting, that is right now i2c-aspeed.c
>>> .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-i2c-bus", And there have a global register
>> that can set i2c controller as new mode register set.
>>> That I am going to drive. That I post is all register in new an old register list.
>>>
>>> For example,
>>> Global register [2] = 0 => i2c present as old register set Global
>>> register [2] = 1 => i2c present as new register set
>> It's the same device though, so the same compatible.
>
> Sorry, it is different design, and it share the same register space.
> So that the reason add new compatible "aspeed,ast2600-i2cv2" for this driver.
> It is different register layout.
Which device is described by the existing "aspeed,ast2600-i2c-bus"
compatible? And which device is described by new compatible?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 5:59 [PATCH v16 0/3] Add ASPEED AST2600 I2Cv2 controller driver Ryan Chen
2025-02-24 5:59 ` [PATCH v16 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: support for AST2600-i2cv2 Ryan Chen
2025-02-24 7:16 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-02-24 9:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-24 9:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-26 9:28 ` Ryan Chen
2025-02-26 9:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-27 8:19 ` Ryan Chen
2025-02-27 20:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-05 9:35 ` Ryan Chen
2025-03-17 7:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-17 9:21 ` Ryan Chen
2025-03-19 7:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-19 11:12 ` Ryan Chen
2025-03-24 7:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-03-24 8:30 ` Ryan Chen
2025-03-24 9:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-24 10:01 ` Ryan Chen
2025-03-24 11:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-25 9:52 ` Ryan Chen
2025-03-25 10:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-24 5:59 ` [PATCH v16 2/3] i2c: aspeed: support AST2600 i2c new register mode driver Ryan Chen
2025-02-24 8:54 ` Philipp Zabel
2025-02-24 9:04 ` Ryan Chen
2025-02-24 9:32 ` Philipp Zabel
2025-02-28 1:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-28 12:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-17 7:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-17 8:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-17 8:51 ` Ryan Chen
2025-03-17 8:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-24 5:59 ` [PATCH v16 3/3] i2c: aspeed: support AST2600 i2c new register target " Ryan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=994cb954-f3c4-4a44-800e-9303787c1be9@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elbadrym@google.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).