From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B5CC433E6 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6513B64DF9 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232550AbhA1QXK (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:23:10 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:48954 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232541AbhA1QXF (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:23:05 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10SGLQPf096821; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:21:26 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1611850886; bh=WNPd19A6ZtEmXx99rm146phP+kamA89IVTD2nlMa+3o=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=a6F0mkCyCRv177V5XkYGbbl4T94yEqk903KIxBy0cQX4TVpLdgIeL/cvX96SD+0xb yCXSiucblmvM742ScDIaaKH3Z3CfKGjq1QFcmrt5C5lJT3ee+yKLhRNLd4TXTLxIC1 invW25XhtJRPgKvrkdbqK8HLapXlB4E486Yz94yA= Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (dfle106.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.27]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10SGLQRE028573 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:21:26 -0600 Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:21:26 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:21:26 -0600 Received: from [10.250.232.169] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10SGLL8S064659; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:21:22 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add support for zeroth instance of GPIO subsystem To: Nishanth Menon CC: Vignesh Raghavendra , Lokesh Vutla , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Faiz Abbas , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , , , References: <20210127150815.16991-1-a-govindraju@ti.com> <20210127150815.16991-2-a-govindraju@ti.com> <20210127151256.tgbhpngy6fi43edj@create> <9308ad5d-48bd-ebd2-2ea3-9775b8c11163@ti.com> <20210127155441.e2oho7m4aeovkafw@absinthe> From: Aswath Govindraju Message-ID: <9959fc6b-1f3f-53b4-91fd-a8dc46a871b6@ti.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:51:21 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210127155441.e2oho7m4aeovkafw@absinthe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Nishanth, On 27/01/21 9:24 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 20:56-20210127, Aswath Govindraju wrote: >> Hi Nishanth, >> >> On 27/01/21 8:42 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 20:38-20210127, Aswath Govindraju wrote: >>>> Add support for the zeroth instance of GPIO subsystem in the main domain. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju >>> >>> >>> I really dont want to pick up one patch per node instance. It is hard >>> to scale and just creates a lot of noise. >>> >> >> As the main goal of the patch series was to add support for higher speed >> modes in MMC, I added only the required ones. If required I will send a >> follow up patch to add the remaining GPIO nodes. > > > I dont plan on picking this patch up in it's current form. please send a > patch with all the gpio nodes added in as it makes no sense to split > these out. > I have sent a respin for this patch series(v4) which adds all the GPIO nodes in the device tree files. Thanks, Aswath