From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or
 is there something better?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:22:06 -0000
Message-ID: <99db70b50b3ddcf20d940d5855c657e0.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org>
References: <20131023080630.GA14413@netboy>
 <20131023172955.GA17145@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20131023174458.GC5208@netboy>
 <1382553982.31058.10.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net>
 <20131024095232.27BBCC4039D@trevor.secretlab.ca>
 <1382614439.6040.16.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net>
 <1382615278.8522.72.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
 <20131024122346.GD11296@ulmo.nvidia.com>
 <1382619655.6040.52.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net>
 <516bfc7f9366ff3ef9187c36dd160888.squirrel@twosheds.infradead.org>
 <20131024141241.GA25061@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131024141241.GA25061@ulmo.nvidia.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" <ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>, mbizon@freebox.fr, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org


> Experimental bindings could be a suitable temporary measure, but perhaps
> other, better solutions exist.

Yes, unstable bindings are part of the currently-documented plan. You are
not expected to need it as a matter of course, but that facility will
exist.


-- 
dwmw2