From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: sunxi: Add A10 CSI driver Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:37:08 +0100 Message-ID: <9a9616d2-a189-bd0e-e2e6-f84bdcb1dfd1@cisco.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Fabio Estevam , Maxime Ripard Cc: Hans Verkuil , Sakari Ailus , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Thomas Petazzoni , Laurent Pinchart , linux-media , Andrzej Hajda , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-kernel , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/13/18 13:48, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:25 AM Maxime Ripard wrote: > >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun4i-csi/sun4i_csi.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst this should be: > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > Same applies to other places in this patch. > Actually, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 has GPL-2.0-or-later as a valid license: Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later Personally I very much prefer GPL-2.0-or-later since I think it is much clearer. Regards, Hans