devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/simpledrm: Add support for system memory framebuffers
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 16:54:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bf3dde1-dbbf-a03f-6659-68ecd4fce8cf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3em7dwyJgQI1vZw@orome>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8776 bytes --]

Hi

Am 18.11.22 um 16:38 schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:21:14PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 17.11.22 um 19:40 schrieb Thierry Reding:
>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> Simple framebuffers can be set up in system memory, which cannot be
>>> requested and/or I/O remapped using the I/O resource helpers. Add a
>>> separate code path that obtains system memory framebuffers from the
>>> reserved memory region referenced in the memory-region property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - simplify memory code and move back to simpledrm_device_create()
>>> - extract screen_base iosys_map fix into separate patch
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - make screen base a struct iosys_map to avoid sparse warnings
>>>
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>    1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
>>> index 3673a42e4bf4..7f39bc58da52 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/clk.h>
>>>    #include <linux/of_clk.h>
>>>    #include <linux/minmax.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>    #include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
>>>    #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>    #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>> @@ -184,6 +185,31 @@ simplefb_get_format_of(struct drm_device *dev, struct device_node *of_node)
>>>    	return simplefb_get_validated_format(dev, format);
>>>    }
>>> +static struct resource *
>>> +simplefb_get_memory_of(struct drm_device *dev, struct device_node *of_node)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct device_node *np;
>>> +	struct resource *res;
>>> +	int err;
>>> +
>>> +	np = of_parse_phandle(of_node, "memory-region", 0);
>>> +	if (!np)
>>> +		return NULL;
>>> +
>>> +	res = devm_kzalloc(dev->dev, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!res)
>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> +	err = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, res);
>>> +	if (err)
>>> +		return ERR_PTR(err);
>>> +
>>> +	if (of_get_property(of_node, "reg", NULL))
>>> +		drm_warn(dev, "preferring \"memory-region\" over \"reg\" property\n");
>>
>> The reg property is converted to a device resource when we create the device
>> at [1].
>>
>> I have another question, which I was discussing with Javier recently. Is it
>> possible to handle memory-region there automatically? If, for exmaple, it
>> would create a resource with IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE, simpledrm would handle it
>> as memory region. Without the CACHEABLE flag, it would be a regular resource
>> as before.
> 
> memory-region properties are not typically converted into a standard
> resource automatically. One reason may be that they can have additional
> properties associated with them and so something like a CACHEABLE type
> may not apply.
> 
> It's also standard to convert "reg" properties into struct resource and
> that's what many drivers will expect. I don't know if all drivers will
> gracefully handle being passed a struct resource that was created in
> this way from a memory-region property. If at all I think this would
> need to be special-cased for simple-framebuffer, in which case I'm not
> convinced that putting the special case into the core OF code is any
> better than putting it into the simpledrm driver.
> 
> Also, even if we did so, what would it really change? We may be able to
> avoid the explicit DT lookup, but the bulk of the memory-region code is
> actually mapping it, etc. That part we won't be able to automatically
> handle, I think.
> 
> Ultimately this is up to Rob, not sure if he'll want to extend the
> simple-framebuffer node creation code any further.

Thanks for explaining. It was simply something we wondered about.

The simpledrm device driver hands over device ownership to the 
hardware's native driver during the boot process. To make this work in 
all cases, the OF code needs to be involved. So at some point, we'll 
need to move some of the memory-region code into the OF code. But how 
exactly this has to be done can be discussed later.

Best regards
Thomas

> 
> Thierry
> 
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>> [1]
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0.9/source/drivers/of/platform.c#L586
>>
>>> +
>>> +	return res;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /*
>>>     * Simple Framebuffer device
>>>     */
>>> @@ -623,8 +649,7 @@ static struct simpledrm_device *simpledrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
>>>    	struct drm_device *dev;
>>>    	int width, height, stride;
>>>    	const struct drm_format_info *format;
>>> -	struct resource *res, *mem;
>>> -	void __iomem *screen_base;
>>> +	struct resource *res, *mem = NULL;
>>>    	struct drm_plane *primary_plane;
>>>    	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>>>    	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>>> @@ -676,6 +701,9 @@ static struct simpledrm_device *simpledrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
>>>    		format = simplefb_get_format_of(dev, of_node);
>>>    		if (IS_ERR(format))
>>>    			return ERR_CAST(format);
>>> +		mem = simplefb_get_memory_of(dev, of_node);
>>> +		if (IS_ERR(mem))
>>> +			return ERR_CAST(mem);
>>>    	} else {
>>>    		drm_err(dev, "no simplefb configuration found\n");
>>>    		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> @@ -698,32 +726,55 @@ static struct simpledrm_device *simpledrm_device_create(struct drm_driver *drv,
>>>    	 * Memory management
>>>    	 */
>>> -	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> -	if (!res)
>>> -		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> +	if (mem) {
>>> +		void *screen_base;
>>> -	ret = devm_aperture_acquire_from_firmware(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
>>> -	if (ret) {
>>> -		drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: error %d\n", res, ret);
>>> -		return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> -	}
>>> +		ret = devm_aperture_acquire_from_firmware(dev, mem->start, resource_size(mem));
>>> +		if (ret) {
>>> +			drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: %d\n", mem, ret);
>>> +			return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> +		}
>>> -	mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res), drv->name);
>>> -	if (!mem) {
>>> -		/*
>>> -		 * We cannot make this fatal. Sometimes this comes from magic
>>> -		 * spaces our resource handlers simply don't know about. Use
>>> -		 * the I/O-memory resource as-is and try to map that instead.
>>> -		 */
>>> -		drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", res);
>>> -		mem = res;
>>> -	}
>>> +		drm_info(dev, "using system memory framebuffer at %pr\n", mem);
>>> -	screen_base = devm_ioremap_wc(&pdev->dev, mem->start, resource_size(mem));
>>> -	if (!screen_base)
>>> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +		screen_base = devm_memremap(dev->dev, mem->start, resource_size(mem), MEMREMAP_WB);
>>> +		if (!screen_base)
>>> +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> +		iosys_map_set_vaddr(&sdev->screen_base, screen_base);
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		void __iomem *screen_base;
>>> +
>>> +		res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> +		if (!res)
>>> +			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>> -	iosys_map_set_vaddr_iomem(&sdev->screen_base, screen_base);
>>> +		ret = devm_aperture_acquire_from_firmware(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
>>> +		if (ret) {
>>> +			drm_err(dev, "could not acquire memory range %pr: %d\n", &res, ret);
>>> +			return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>> +		drm_info(dev, "using I/O memory framebuffer at %pr\n", res);
>>> +
>>> +		mem = devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res),
>>> +					      drv->name);
>>> +		if (!mem) {
>>> +			/*
>>> +			 * We cannot make this fatal. Sometimes this comes from magic
>>> +			 * spaces our resource handlers simply don't know about. Use
>>> +			 * the I/O-memory resource as-is and try to map that instead.
>>> +			 */
>>> +			drm_warn(dev, "could not acquire memory region %pr\n", res);
>>> +			mem = res;
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>> +		screen_base = devm_ioremap_wc(&pdev->dev, mem->start, resource_size(mem));
>>> +		if (!screen_base)
>>> +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>> +
>>> +		iosys_map_set_vaddr_iomem(&sdev->screen_base, screen_base);
>>> +	}
>>>    	/*
>>>    	 * Modesetting
>>
>> -- 
>> Thomas Zimmermann
>> Graphics Driver Developer
>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>> Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-17 18:40 [PATCH v3 0/8] drm/simpledrm: Support system memory framebuffers Thierry Reding
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] dt-bindings: display: simple-framebuffer: " Thierry Reding
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] dt-bindings: display: simple-framebuffer: Document 32-bit BGR format Thierry Reding
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] dt-bindings: reserved-memory: Support framebuffer reserved memory Thierry Reding
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/simpledrm: Use struct iosys_map consistently Thierry Reding
2022-11-18 13:56   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/simpledrm: Add support for system memory framebuffers Thierry Reding
2022-11-18 14:11   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-11-18 14:21   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-11-18 15:38     ` Thierry Reding
2022-11-18 15:54       ` Thomas Zimmermann [this message]
2022-11-18 16:28         ` Thierry Reding
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] drm/format-helper: Support the XB24 format Thierry Reding
2022-11-18 15:00   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/simpledrm: Support the XB24/AB24 format Thierry Reding
2022-11-18 15:08   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-11-18 15:44     ` Thierry Reding
2022-11-18 16:10       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-11-18 16:34         ` Thierry Reding
2022-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] arm64: tegra: Add simple framebuffer on Jetson Xavier NX Thierry Reding
2023-01-17 14:55   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-19 15:10     ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9bf3dde1-dbbf-a03f-6659-68ecd4fce8cf@suse.de \
    --to=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).