Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] firmware: psci: Read and use vendor reset types

[Shivendra Pratap <quic_spratap@quicinc.com>]

Tested-by: Shivendra Pratap <quic_spratap@quicinc.com> # on QCS6490-RB3GEN2, QCM6490-IDP

Can we take it up now?

On 7/9/2024 4:49 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 08:50:58PM -0700, Trilok Soni wrote:
>> On 7/2/2024 4:42 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
>>> On 7/2/2024 4:06 PM, Elliot Berman wrote:
>>>> Hi Sudeep,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:41:42PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>>> Sorry, I completely missed to see that you had already answered those
>>>>> in your commit message. As mentioned earlier I haven't looked at the
>>>>> reboot mode framework completely yet, so I can't comment on it yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't want to be blocker though if others are happy with this.
>>>>
>>>> I think folks are satisfied with the other parts of the series and now
>>>> looking for your conclusion on the PSCI driver part.
>>>
>>> I will be nice to get these patches picked up before 4th July holiday in US :).
>>
> 
> July 3rd was already late to target v6.11 😉, the merge window may open next
> Sunday. Ideally we prefer to have code reviewed and merged before previous
> -rc6 so that it spends couple of weeks in -next before the merge. If I were
> to merge, I freeze my branch by -rc5 and send PR to Arnd after that so that
> Arnd gets some time with the integration of all other PRs.
> 
>> Sorry to bug you again Sudeep - but I need confirmation that these patches looks good to you
>> and you will pick them up. Thanks.
> 
> FYI I am not the maintainer of PSCI. I have given my feedback but I haven't
> been able to explore reset/reboot core support in much detail to provide
> any further useful suggestions to move the code out of PSCI like I would
> ideally like to. But that said I don't want to block this series just for
> that reason.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep