Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] pinctrl: samsung: support ExynosAuto GPIO structure

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 08/12/2023 08:45, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> New ExynosAuto series GPIO have a different register structure.
> In the existing Exynos series, EINT control register enumerated after

Missing verb... or enumerated is past tense? I just don't get entire
sentence.

> a specific offset (e.g EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET, EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET).
> However, from ExynosAutov920 SoC, the register that controls EINT belongs
> to each GPIO bank, and each GPIO bank has 0x1000 align.
> 
> This is a structure to protect the GPIO bank using S2MPU in VM environment,
> and will only be applied in ExynosAuto series SoCs.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> | original		| ExynosAutov920	|
> |-----------------------------------------------|
> | 0x0	GPIO_CON	| 0x0	GPIO_CON	|
> | 0x4	GPIO_DAT	| 0x4	GPIO_DAT	|
> | 0x8	GPIO_PUD	| 0x8	GPIO_PUD	|
> | 0xc	GPIO_DRV	| 0xc	GPIO_DRV	|
> | 0x10	GPIO_CONPDN	| 0x10	GPIO_CONPDN	|
> | 0x14	GPIO_PUDPDN	| 0x14	GPIO_PUDPDN	|
> | 0x700	EINT_CON	| 0x18	EINT_CON	|

This suggests there is EINT_CON per bank in old and new register layout.
I don't think it's true, so probably this could look like:

| ---                           | 0x18	EINT_CON (per_bank) |
| ---                           | 0x18	EINT_FLTCON0 (per_bank) |
| ---                           | 0x18	EINT_FLTCON1 (per_bank) |
| ---                           | 0x18	EINT_MASK (per_bank) |
| 0x700	EINT_CON (global)       | 0x18	EINT_CON	|

etc..

Also, please use spaces for alignment in the table.



Best regards,
Krzysztof