Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML schema for LGM SDXC PHY

["Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Rob,

   Thank you so much for the conclusion.

On 4/9/2019 5:34 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:52 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>>      Thank you for your suggestions and clarifications.
>>
>> On 3/9/2019 6:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:08 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>>     Thank you so much for prompt reply.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/9/2019 5:19 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:57 AM Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
>>>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for review comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/9/2019 9:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:43:14PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add a YAML schema to use the host controller driver with the
>>>>>>>> SDXC PHY on Intel's Lightning Mountain SoC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>      .../bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml           | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>      .../devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml      | 33 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>      2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>      create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>>>>>>>>      create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>> index 000000000000..99647207b414
>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>>>>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>>>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>>>>>> +---
>>>>>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml#
>>>>>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +title: Intel Lightning Mountain(LGM) SDXC PHY Device Tree Bindings
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +maintainers:
>>>>>>>> +  - Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>>>>> +  - $ref: "intel,syscon.yaml"
>>>>>>> You don't need this. It should be selected and applied by the compatible
>>>>>>> string matching.
>>>>>> Agreed, fix it in the next patch.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +description: Binding for SDXC PHY
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +properties:
>>>>>>>> +  compatible:
>>>>>>>> +    const: intel,lgm-sdxc-phy
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +  intel,syscon:
>>>>>>>> +    description: phandle to the sdxc through syscon
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +  clocks:
>>>>>>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +  clock-names:
>>>>>>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +  "#phy-cells":
>>>>>>>> +    const: 0
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +required:
>>>>>>>> +  - "#phy-cells"
>>>>>>>> +  - compatible
>>>>>>>> +  - intel,syscon
>>>>>>>> +  - clocks
>>>>>>>> +  - clock-names
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +examples:
>>>>>>>> +  - |
>>>>>>>> +    sdxc_phy: sdxc_phy {
>>>>>>>> +        compatible = "intel,lgm-sdxc-phy";
>>>>>>>> +        intel,syscon = <&sysconf>;
>>>>>>> Make this a child of the below node and then you don't need this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If there's a register address range associated with this, then add a reg
>>>>>>> property.
>>>>>> Thanks for comments,  I have defined herewith example
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sysconf: chiptop@e0020000 {
>>>>>>                 compatible = "intel,syscon";
>>>>> Needs to be SoC specific value.
>>>> Agreed! it should be "intel, lgm-syscon"
>>>>>>                 reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 emmc_phy: emmc_phy {
>>>>>>                     compatible = "intel,lgm-emmc-phy";
>>>>>>                     intel,syscon = <&sysconf>;
>>>>> This is redundant because you can just get the parent node.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there's a defined register range within the 'intel,syscon' block
>>>>> then define it here with 'reg'.
>>>> Agreed!, avoided redundant
>>>>
>>>> sysconf: chiptop@e0020000 {
>>>>                compatible = "intel,lgm-syscon";
>>>>                emmc_phy: emmc_phy {
>>>>                    compatible = "intel,lgm-emmc-phy";
>>>>                    reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>;
>>> This is the same addresses you had for the parent, so that doesn't
>>> seem right. The parent should have the entire range and then the child
>>> nodes only the addresses for their functions. However, if the
>>> registers are all interleaved then you can really put 'reg' in the
>>> child nodes and just have it only in the parent. We don't want to have
>>> overlapping addresses in DT.
>> syscon is parent node, which has the base address for all the peripheral
>> registers and used by child nodes.
>> child nodes have only offsets, we do not specify in device tree.
> Right, and I'm asking you to add the offsets whether Linux uses them or not.

Agreed!, will update the patch.

Best Regards
vadivel
> Rob