Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: qcom,spmi-vadc: fix PM8350 define

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 17/11/2022 16:56, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 13:28:33 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 17/11/2022 13:22, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:13:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:  
>>>> The defines from include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350.h were
>>>> changed to take sid argument:
>>>>
>>>>   Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.example.dts:99.28-29 syntax error
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>  
>>>
>>> Looks like I didn't rebase on top of Bjorn's for-next for my series, so didn't
>>> see this example.
>>>
>>> Thanks for fixing!
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>>>   
>>
>> This should not go via Bjorn's tree without IIO ack and
>> Jonathan/Lars-Peter/IIO lists were not in CC.
>>
> Thanks for the heads up. 
> 
> Not sure I'd have registered there would have been a problem here even
> if I had seen original patch.  Anyhow, I assume Bjorn will pick this up
> and all will be well again.
> 
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

I am afraid it cannot go via Bjorn's tree, because this depends on a
change in your tree:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221027143411.277980-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/

Can you pick it up instead? This is the only way to fix the linux-next,
although your tree will have a dt_binding_check error.

Other way is to have cross-tree merge, but the commit to bindings
headers ended up in DTS patch, so it cannot be shared with driver tree.

Best regards,
Krzysztof