Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: intel-sdxc-phy: Add YAML schema for LGM SDXC PHY

["Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Rob,

Thank you for review comments.

On 2/9/2019 9:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 08:43:14PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Add a YAML schema to use the host controller driver with the
>> SDXC PHY on Intel's Lightning Mountain SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml           | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml      | 33 ++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..99647207b414
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,lgm-sdxc-phy.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Intel Lightning Mountain(LGM) SDXC PHY Device Tree Bindings
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> +  - $ref: "intel,syscon.yaml"
> You don't need this. It should be selected and applied by the compatible
> string matching.
Agreed, fix it in the next patch.
>> +
>> +description: Binding for SDXC PHY
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    const: intel,lgm-sdxc-phy
>> +
>> +  intel,syscon:
>> +    description: phandle to the sdxc through syscon
>> +
>> +  clocks:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  clock-names:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  "#phy-cells":
>> +    const: 0
>> +
>> +required:
>> +  - "#phy-cells"
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - intel,syscon
>> +  - clocks
>> +  - clock-names
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    sdxc_phy: sdxc_phy {
>> +        compatible = "intel,lgm-sdxc-phy";
>> +        intel,syscon = <&sysconf>;
> Make this a child of the below node and then you don't need this.
>
> If there's a register address range associated with this, then add a reg
> property.

Thanks for comments,  I have defined herewith example

sysconf: chiptop@e0020000 {
             compatible = "intel,syscon";
             reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>;

             emmc_phy: emmc_phy {
                 compatible = "intel,lgm-emmc-phy";
                 intel,syscon = <&sysconf>;
                 clocks = <&emmc>;
                 clock-names = "emmcclk";
                 #phy-cells = <0>;
            };
};

Is this way need to add right?

>> +        clocks = <&sdxc>;
>> +        clock-names = "sdxcclk";
>> +        #phy-cells = <0>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +...
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d0b78805e49f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,syscon.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,syscon.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Syscon for eMMC/SDXC PHY Device Tree Bindings
> Nothing else in this h/w block? If there are other functions, then this
> should not be in bindings/phy/.
Drop this one.
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    const: intel,syscon
> Needs to be more specific and reflect h/w blocks. 'syscon' is a Linux
> thing to some extent.
Agreed, will drop it.

Best Regards
vadivel
>> +
>> +  reg:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  "#reset-cells":
>> +   const: 1
>> +
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +  - "#reset-cells"
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    sysconf: chiptop@e0020000 {
>> +       compatible = "intel,syscon", "syscon";
>> +       reg = <0xe0020000 0x100>;
>> +       #reset-cells = <1>;
>> +    };
>> -- 
>> 2.11.0
>>