From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:42221 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751546AbeDJRMk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:12:40 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f66.google.com with SMTP id q9-v6so12749691lfk.9 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 10:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77970: add LVDS support References: <1523357646-3946-1-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <1523357646-3946-4-git-send-email-jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org> <0baa0f6e-f275-4a27-c76b-e4f8aec0b5f6@cogentembedded.com> <20180410121352.GD6436@w540> From: Sergei Shtylyov Message-ID: <9f54ba77-368f-3d0c-cb58-4849672af449@cogentembedded.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:12:36 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180410121352.GD6436@w540> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-MW Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: jacopo mondi Cc: Jacopo Mondi , horms@verge.net.au, magnus.damm@gmail.com, geert@linux-m68k.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Niklas_S=c3=b6derlund?= List-ID: On 04/10/2018 03:13 PM, jacopo mondi wrote: >>> From: Niklas Söderlund >>> >>> Add the LVDS device to r8a77970.dtsi in a disabled state. Also connect >>> the it to the LVDS output of the DU. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund >>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi >>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart >>> >>> --- >>> v1 -> v2: >>> - Rebased on the modified endpoint name and changed patch subject to >>> comply with other patches in the series from Sergei. >> >> Stop, what was wrong with my R8A77970 LVDS patch, reposted on the popular >> demand? :-) >> > > Nothing wrong, I found out about your right now. > I see a very small difference as > lvds@feb90000 vs lvds-encoder@feb90000 Yes, I thought the latter was closer to a "generic" name that DT spec requires... > You can add your signed-off-by ofc if you think that's the case. Didn't understand what you mean here... > Thanks > j MBR, Sergei