Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: sec-qfprom: Add bindings for secure qfprom

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 26/06/2023 11:02, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/26/2023 2:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/06/2023 10:22, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +allOf:
>>>>> +  - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
>>>>> +
>>>>> +properties:
>>>>> +  compatible:
>>>>> +    items:
>>>>> +      - enum:
>>>>> +          - qcom,qdu1000-sec-qfprom
>>>>> +      - const: qcom,sec-qfprom
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  reg:
>>>>> +    items:
>>>>> +      - description: The secure qfprom corrected region.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  # Needed if any child nodes are present.
>>>>> +  "#address-cells":
>>>>> +    const: 1
>>>>> +  "#size-cells":
>>>>> +    const: 1
>>>> Drop both, they are not needed.
>>> I didn't get it. Can you please explain why these are not needed as this
>>> node will have child nodes which will use single value for address and size.
>> I suspect they are already defined. Do other bindings (for cases with
>> children) have them? If not, why here it would be different?
> 
> Yes, I see there are bindings that has these properties, listed a few of 
> them below -
> 
> [1] 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml

Please work on current development. It's a bit of waste of time to
review old code...

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230611140330.154222-16-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org/

> [2] 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml

That's not a nvmem provider.

> [3] 
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/arm,arch_timer_mmio.yaml

That's not a nvmem provider.


Best regards,
Krzysztof