Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974

[Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>]

On 08/31/18 16:01, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 31 Aug 15:46 PDT 2018, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> +		spmi_bus: spmi@fc4cf000 {
>>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>>> +			reg-names = "core", "intr", "cnfg";
>>> +			reg = <0xfc4cf000 0x1000>,
>>> +			      <0xfc4cb000 0x1000>,
>>> +			      <0xfc4ca000 0x1000>;
>>> +			interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
>>
>>> +			interrupts = <0 190 0>;
>>
>> The final value in this interrupts property means IRQ_TYPE_NONE.
>>
>> A WARN_ON() was added early this year to complain about use of
>> IRQ_TYPE_NONE: 83a86fbb5b56 "irqchip/gic: Loudly complain about
>> the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE", resulting in many warnings spewing
>> forth when I boot an APQ8074 Dragonboard.  I am trying to
>> determine whether the warning is overly aggressive, or whether
>> the IRQ TYPE is incorrectly specified for the spmi node.
>>
>> The interrupt-parent for the spmi node is intc: interrupt-controller@f9000000,
>> which has compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2".  I do not know the architecture
>> or implementation of this interrupt controller.  Is an IRQ_TYPE_NONE
>> valid in this case, or should a specific type be provided?
>>
> 
> No, IRQ_TYPE_NONE isn't valid and the WARN_ON() is reasonable.
> 
> Please change it to IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH. And while you're at it, replace
> the first 0 with GIC_SPI.
> 
> 
> If you have more of these warnings you can most likely look at e.g.
> msm8916 (arm64) to find the right flags.

Thanks, I'll create a patch.