From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] ARM: tegra: emc: device tree bindings Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1318873976-25335-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF173CA2CBFB@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF173CA2CC18@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF173CA2CCA9@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <4E9E3801.6080707@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Rob Herring , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > In cases where unit addresses can be used to separate out identical > entries, yes. For something like this, there's no logical addressing > of the tables so something else must be used to distinguish them. You can always add some dummy addressing, like is also used for cpu nodes etc. Segher