From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add support for RZ/V2H(P) SoC
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:43:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8s-fCtQ8GKVh_REkPO81v0oCKPGiLJ5aiJOVdVUbvbCzA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY3PR01MB113467E6EF1CFC24154AF73E986C82@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Biju,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:30 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Wolfram, Prabhakar,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 8:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add support for RZ/V2H(P) SoC
> >
> > Hi Prabhakar,
> >
> > > I did give it a try with platform_driver_probe() and failed.
> >
> > Ok, thanks for trying nonetheless!
> >
> > > - Firstly I had to move the regulator node outside the SDHI node for
> > > platform_driver_probe() to succeed or else it failed with -ENODEV (at
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > #L953)
> >
> > This makes sense to me because it is just a "regular" regulator.
> >
> > > - In Renesas SoCs we have multiple instances of SDHI, the problem
> > > being for each instance we are calling platform_driver_probe(). Which
> > > causes a problem as the regulator node will use the first device.
> >
> > I see... we would need a reg property to differentiate between the internal regulators but that is
> > already used by the parent SDHI node.
> >
> > Okay, so let's scrap that idea. However, we need to ensure that we can still have an external
> > regulator. Seeing the bindings, it looks like you enable the internal regulator with the "vqmmc-
> > r9a09g057-regulator"
> > property? I wonder now if we can simplify this to an "use-internal-regulator" property because we
> > have 'compatible' already to differentiate? Needs advice from DT maintainers, probably.
>
> Why this cannot be modelled as a regular "regulator" as a child device of SDHI device?
>
The current implementation does implement the regulator as a child
device of the sdhi node [0] itself.
Wolfram was suggesting to have the regulator outside and use
platform_driver_probe(), which caused an issue as mentioned above.
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20240613091721.525266-2-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
Cheers,
Prabhakar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 9:17 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add SD/MMC support for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC Prabhakar
2024-06-13 9:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: renesas,sdhi: Document RZ/V2H(P) support Prabhakar
2024-06-13 9:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: tmio: Use MMC core APIs to control the vqmmc regulator Prabhakar
2024-06-17 7:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-17 7:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-13 9:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add support for RZ/V2H(P) SoC Prabhakar
2024-06-17 8:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-19 16:18 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2024-06-20 7:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-20 9:30 ` Biju Das
2024-06-20 9:43 ` Lad, Prabhakar [this message]
2024-06-20 9:49 ` Biju Das
2024-06-20 9:59 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2024-06-20 17:15 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2024-06-21 7:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-21 11:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-21 12:33 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2024-06-28 14:17 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2024-06-20 15:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-20 15:56 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2024-06-21 7:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-21 7:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-21 7:42 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+V-a8s-fCtQ8GKVh_REkPO81v0oCKPGiLJ5aiJOVdVUbvbCzA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).