From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7A3C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238902AbiCBN6r (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:58:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47308 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237510AbiCBN6q (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 08:58:46 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-x112a.google.com (mail-yw1-x112a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EB1444758; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 05:58:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-x112a.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2dbc48104beso18333717b3.5; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 05:58:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WyKZHwQr5nHGh+e/AL2B1v9HpePCkAYLR4kSXAi9MZM=; b=U0iRu5f8BNM7nILytuX99wKRiCt5vyXXtohu2gzG08qdN7tcXTPoGXlhxytmpKy1iA aNRVUQw8yBm9ys3DsFF5OcoMDLqqmeboEw+3QfaLX5T662sg8X/+bTOD77v9lY895NDW wwbsulJSTGTqRpdarJ6DxHV8jQGHjiMM5IFu/dq6WY828tpsdYxnPR1ciPVinQ0C0OnS s9Lf5lNVUbAsmJn9xlYQDooufA2oVbtDdhQ1787jugqmSS8yo7mbJB2h2spLwaSEwjRr PCHg6atVK7AtntJLp8gUyNPNq2FlJS5WawBmlQMUQ2yop5685zmCPuLhSa/SoYVuyeJr SPNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WyKZHwQr5nHGh+e/AL2B1v9HpePCkAYLR4kSXAi9MZM=; b=nZQRfJ9fnX2UByeUPR7q/CHIT1x8cex9vRMo+ge4q8M0dN6UHmKnLtfZiNdzJvS09C lNl4fIWFhRV8k9JhYvBrPDtO5u9PirrZhN8Ro6bKgDzDHyNkVKq3HZUzXMDM52+3QIfZ cg7aMR1P/GRJCNUkwa55AsKTW2QiHE+1mAMO9ByCLFipGuP9HHnl7VncKbM+JtudjGwP EE2UyROMJtfzPumzKehbcSV+LzK6xvmhvF4VwJ46j1L8C4HoBIrLc3Azs4Ne0gqnJYJc /6RSHdkl7xJgmX5KEfZAU10D7mVrE/XvqolxMs6p0oF3+JnKXc7rPAV9otVd9VCUPmcY Hagw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dSN3bxiC0c+kIwX0+HOhNoC+WWCF8OuVM3t+/fgjYNnuQ7782 NXvRkEPZmdOszm3o1lBsV6GOFg1X3jXNvRPECfDyYks8UTRQ9w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPac81GZXj3hbm1zrqa6T6Hpt+Qnmao5PDX2WxpONnx7zBPrAfJH7wYFShqmnZ+sbpuc/u4K6tmZwwOpAKXuA= X-Received: by 2002:a81:2f12:0:b0:2d7:d366:164a with SMTP id v18-20020a812f12000000b002d7d366164amr30593700ywv.265.1646229482232; Wed, 02 Mar 2022 05:58:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220227213250.23637-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Lad, Prabhakar" Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:57:36 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/V2L SoC To: Rob Herring Cc: Lad Prabhakar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Wolfgang Grandegger , Marc Kleine-Budde , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Fabrizio Castro , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , LKML , Biju Das Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Rob, On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:34 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 09:32:50PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > > Document RZ/V2L CANFD bindings. RZ/V2L CANFD is identical to one found on > > the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible > > string "renesas,rzg2l-canfd" will be used as a fallback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar > > Reviewed-by: Biju Das > > --- > > DTSI changes [0] have been posted as part of separate series. > > > > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/ > > 20220227203744.18355-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/ > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > The patch wouldn't apply, but I don't see the problem other than the > sha hashes are not from a known base. Please send patches against a > known rcX (rc1 is preferred) unless you have some other dependency. And > document that dependency. > Sorry about that, I missed mentioning the depadancy patch [0]. > Anyways, it is applied manually now. > Thanks. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20220209163806.18618-5-uli+renesas@fpond.eu/ Cheers, Prabhakar