From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA67C10F1B for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 11:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231947AbiLSL2R (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 06:28:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37538 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231297AbiLSL2Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2022 06:28:16 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95856B49A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 03:28:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id b16so9153173yba.0 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 03:28:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VMzRLzpincvsgDVrWJjWjP9c4+ebaH5xlefFAGcNSZA=; b=DMVPFm0Qra9ZvdI6GKXI+xlvwdbT5lwLM8UR0YOC5fSQbwHKk7RntvaxLgWFASZUJe oT3TvPOVWUVCYvbvqmplYlrGXZfBUDnlyOQ/sD7QXyaYJ2SaDr+a9Ea7GVxpceseaHdF t78QI68S8jMNZqs8bs2zDXosG6U4O8hV/YvQFqnBdgesha7r4NqWJ69ZbDDbicDWC0eO flxfn+AA6g8koS4YKFWoq3x3PL5+mG+/+Mek1UdKpzt0LlXKBmDzQK+8Zw0hiISX1Wi/ mVGMxFrBL812p0tNTD/JHf8iUFfWFztY5Bjuo2JOyW1GAowqmvez/cwZMxjE1graAlxZ HHwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=VMzRLzpincvsgDVrWJjWjP9c4+ebaH5xlefFAGcNSZA=; b=U2vrShgu3bOxrBFWbmplsikrwEIJXSf/MFbSMTN9dLlp0QVBTJ6U+Y5encgOhf2RUv BGnkgi44sUGntuIW9ZkhpPDacRI8xj+dymasREaMvz0bq23K5Yd/zhcQexT0uMBd03Af aac2Can9xcQMakx0uL+ViFkxdmIjME1PQnkLP9vuqYIsP6jgJ6g09ujgsYF/orB3/MQQ BlLRpd36J8srRMTb7BNDhuL1JxAJKe10DgQwDV9ca3mZGpe1XVz4WiUIeuqEYfpoJt8c 8sfi4V/5LMMhYF4BxdMMPMM8WGSAtF/Ljn3bIYv9of35nbcHlmqbyWrhhFzP4EV3xvvI 8hzA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkDx7jXEByp/ZXg5kHoX9ChzHKHWfjC1pxewwqE92B4iALktWbu fhub6/8dYYygBjqlEO/1QQxlN/yBlOYjTgL0agDvQQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5rJm4+V2jdIAc5ils+CtzrRHnCeWU83mLN5tiYq2OCzVIN03D3XQasvpS35GJdyTd4AGBBoPofWN2Kt+wpZTk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:8544:0:b0:723:5b57:cde9 with SMTP id f4-20020a258544000000b007235b57cde9mr4351163ybn.194.1671449294770; Mon, 19 Dec 2022 03:28:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221030094258.486428-1-iskren.chernev@gmail.com> <20221030094258.486428-6-iskren.chernev@gmail.com> <9e94c0b9-f901-5ac9-2abb-40e958cbe5a2@linaro.org> <3134ba66-27bb-7015-8988-6c8dec046b0f@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Dmitry Baryshkov Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 13:28:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add SM6115 support To: Iskren Chernev Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Adam Skladowski , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Konrad Dybcio , Sai Prakash Ranjan , Emma Anholt , Rob Clark , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 12:01, Iskren Chernev wrote: > > > So, hopefully you can skip this patch completely by depending on the > > generic "qcom,smmu-500" compatible. > > To be clear -- I still need the qcom,SOC-smmu-500 compatible in DT and > bindings, but not in the driver (i.e driver will pick generic)? > > Then this can indeed be dropped (but it is merged in linux-next ATM, > 6.2-rc1 based next won't have it, I guess?). The thread got bumped in my email client, so I replied with my review as if these patches were brand new. However I failed to notice that the patches were already accepted by Will Deacon. And that my rework happened already on top of your patches. So, you don't have to do anything, the IOMMU part will be a part of 6.3. Please excuse me for the noise. -- With best wishes Dmitry