From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Jie Luo <quic_luoj@quicinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, quic_kkumarcs@quicinc.com,
quic_suruchia@quicinc.com, quic_pavir@quicinc.com,
quic_linchen@quicinc.com, quic_leiwei@quicinc.com,
bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CMN PLL node for IPQ9574 SoC
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:11:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprVNOLO-CoorNhvKrrSD1bNKdFrzth5BL0GHXffPv62jw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b336724c-1fea-4e1e-9477-66f53d746f09@quicinc.com>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 09:55, Jie Luo <quic_luoj@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/18/2024 6:32 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:16:54PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote:
> >> The CMN PLL clock controller allows selection of an input
> >> clock rate from a defined set of input clock rates. It in-turn
> >> supplies fixed rate output clocks to the hardware blocks that
> >> provide ethernet functions such as PPE (Packet Process Engine)
> >> and connected switch or PHY, and to GCC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi | 6 +++++-
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
> >> index 91e104b0f865..77e1e42083f3 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp-common.dtsi
> >> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> >> * IPQ9574 RDP board common device tree source
> >> *
> >> * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> - * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> */
> >>
> >> /dts-v1/;
> >> @@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ &usb3 {
> >> status = "okay";
> >> };
> >>
> >> +&cmn_pll_ref_clk {
> >> + clock-frequency = <48000000>;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> &xo_board_clk {
> >> clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >> };
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> >> index 14c7b3a78442..93f66bb83c5a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> >> @@ -3,10 +3,11 @@
> >> * IPQ9574 SoC device tree source
> >> *
> >> * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >> - * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> >> */
> >>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq.h>
> >> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq-cmn-pll.h>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,ipq9574.h>
> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >> @@ -19,6 +20,11 @@ / {
> >> #size-cells = <2>;
> >>
> >> clocks {
> >> + cmn_pll_ref_clk: cmn-pll-ref-clk {
> >> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> + };
> >
> > Which block provides this clock? If it is provided by the external XO
> > then it should not be a part of the SoC dtsi.
>
> The on-chip WiFi block supplies this reference clock. So keeping it in
> the SoC DTSI is perhaps appropriate.
Then maybe it should be provided by the WiFi device node? At least you
should document your design decisions in the commit message.
Also, I don't think this node passes DT schema validation. Did you check it?
>
> >
> >> +
> >> sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
> >> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> @@ -243,6 +249,18 @@ mdio: mdio@90000 {
> >> status = "disabled";
> >> };
> >>
> >> + cmn_pll: clock-controller@9b000 {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-cmn-pll";
> >> + reg = <0x0009b000 0x800>;
> >> + clocks = <&cmn_pll_ref_clk>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_CMN_12GPLL_AHB_CLK>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_CMN_12GPLL_SYS_CLK>;
> >> + clock-names = "ref", "ahb", "sys";
> >> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> >> + assigned-clocks = <&cmn_pll CMN_PLL_CLK>;
> >> + assigned-clock-rates-u64 = /bits/ 64 <12000000000>;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> qfprom: efuse@a4000 {
> >> compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
> >> reg = <0x000a4000 0x5a1>;
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
> >
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 14:16 [PATCH v4 0/4] Add CMN PLL clock controller driver for IPQ9574 Luo Jie
2024-10-15 14:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add CMN PLL clock controller for IPQ SoC Luo Jie
2024-10-15 14:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] clk: qcom: Add CMN PLL clock controller driver " Luo Jie
2024-10-16 21:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-10-17 15:35 ` Jie Luo
2024-10-17 17:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-10-18 6:49 ` Jie Luo
2024-10-15 14:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: defconfig: Enable Qualcomm IPQ CMN PLL clock controller Luo Jie
2024-10-15 14:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add CMN PLL node for IPQ9574 SoC Luo Jie
2024-10-17 22:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-10-18 6:54 ` Jie Luo
2024-10-18 8:11 ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2024-10-18 14:03 ` Jie Luo
2024-10-18 15:38 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-10-23 13:05 ` Jie Luo
2024-10-25 14:05 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA8EJprVNOLO-CoorNhvKrrSD1bNKdFrzth5BL0GHXffPv62jw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=quic_kkumarcs@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_leiwei@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_linchen@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_luoj@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pavir@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_suruchia@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).