devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:58:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5CU79CnRkpo8bpijMCvtzKAkQXj6nadt3YyQSCcq5roXQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191216080445.8747-5-bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>

Hi Bibby,

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 5:04 PM Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Although in the most platforms, the bus power of i2c
> are alway on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power
> in order to meet low power request.
>
> We get and enable bulk regulator in i2c adapter device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/i2c.h         |  3 ++
>  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
>

Thanks for the patch! Please see my comments below.

> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 9333c865d4a9..e95ebd0af200 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
>  static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter      *adap = client->adapter;
>         struct i2c_driver       *driver;
>         int status;
>
> @@ -371,6 +372,12 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>
>         dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
>
> +       status = regulator_enable(adap->bus_reg);
> +       if (status != 0) {
> +               dev_err(&adap->dev, "Failed to enable power regulator\n");
> +               goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> +       }
> +
>         status = of_clk_set_defaults(dev->of_node, false);
>         if (status < 0)
>                 goto err_clear_wakeup_irq;
> @@ -407,6 +414,7 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>  static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct i2c_client       *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter      *adap = client->adapter;
>         struct i2c_driver       *driver;
>         int status = 0;
>
> @@ -420,6 +428,8 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>         }
>
>         dev_pm_domain_detach(&client->dev, true);
> +       if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&adap->dev))
> +               regulator_disable(adap->bus_reg);
>
>         dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(&client->dev);
>         device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, false);
> @@ -431,6 +441,54 @@ static int i2c_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>         return status;
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;

We need to ensure here that if the slave device was not runtime
suspended before the system suspend, the regulator is enabled before
the slave's resume callback is called.

> +
> +       return pm_generic_resume(&adap->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +
> +       return pm_generic_suspend(&adap->dev);

We need to ensure that the regulator is disabled when the system suspends.

> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +
> +       pm_generic_runtime_resume(&adap->dev);

Why adap->dev? This callback is expected to execute a PM operation on
the I2C slave device.

Also, don't we need some error handling here?

> +
> +       return regulator_enable(adap->bus_reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> +       struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +
> +       pm_generic_runtime_suspend(&adap->dev);

Ditto.

> +
> +       if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&adap->dev))

Since we just executed a suspend operation on the device, how is it
possible that it isn't suspended?

> +               return regulator_disable(client->adapter->bus_reg);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops i2c_device_pm = {
> +       SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(i2c_suspend, i2c_resume)
> +       SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(i2c_runtime_suspend, i2c_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
> +
>  static void i2c_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
> @@ -488,6 +546,7 @@ struct bus_type i2c_bus_type = {
>         .probe          = i2c_device_probe,
>         .remove         = i2c_device_remove,
>         .shutdown       = i2c_device_shutdown,
> +       .pm             = &i2c_device_pm,
>  };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_bus_type);
>
> @@ -1351,6 +1410,11 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>                 goto out_reg;
>
>         dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "adapter [%s] registered\n", adap->name);
> +       adap->bus_reg = devm_regulator_get(&adap->dev, "bus");
> +       if (IS_ERR(adap->bus_reg)) {
> +               res = PTR_ERR(adap->bus_reg);
> +               goto out_reg;
> +       }
>
>         pm_runtime_no_callbacks(&adap->dev);
>         pm_suspend_ignore_children(&adap->dev, true);
> @@ -1580,6 +1644,7 @@ void i2c_del_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>         dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "adapter [%s] unregistered\n", adap->name);
>
>         pm_runtime_disable(&adap->dev);
> +       devm_regulator_put(adap->bus_reg);
>
>         i2c_host_notify_irq_teardown(adap);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
> index d2f786706657..833b81a680da 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>  #include <linux/device.h>      /* for struct device */
>  #include <linux/sched.h>       /* for completion */
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/rtmutex.h>
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>           /* for Host Notify IRQ */
>  #include <linux/of.h>          /* for struct device_node */
> @@ -330,6 +331,7 @@ struct i2c_client {
>         int init_irq;                   /* irq set at initialization    */
>         int irq;                        /* irq issued by device         */
>         struct list_head detected;
> +

Unnecessary change.

Best regards,
Tomasz

      reply	other threads:[~2019-12-16 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-16  8:04 [PATCH v9 0/4] add power control in i2c and at24 Bibby Hsieh
2019-12-16  8:04 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-binding: eeprom: at24: add vcc-supply property Bibby Hsieh
2019-12-16  8:04 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] dt-binding: i2c: add bus-supply property Bibby Hsieh
2019-12-18 14:47   ` Rob Herring
2019-12-16  8:04 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] misc: eeprom: at24: support pm_runtime control Bibby Hsieh
2019-12-19 10:50   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-01-06  7:09     ` Bibby Hsieh
2019-12-16  8:04 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter Bibby Hsieh
2019-12-16 11:58   ` Tomasz Figa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAFQd5CU79CnRkpo8bpijMCvtzKAkQXj6nadt3YyQSCcq5roXQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).