From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: tegra: basic support for Trusted Foundations Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:27:09 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1371114745-24710-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1371114745-24710-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <51BA1B41.6030002@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51BA1B41.6030002-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Joseph Lo , Karan Jhavar , Varun Wadekar , Chris Johnson , Matthew Longnecker , Russell King - ARM Linux , Tomasz Figa , Dave Martin , Jassi Brar , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/13/2013 03:12 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Add basic support for booting secondary processors on Tegra devices >> using the Trusted Foundations secure monitor. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra.txt | 11 +++++ >> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 + >> arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 1 + > > The defconfig change should be a separate patch, so that I can squash it > into any other defconfig updates separately from all the code changes. Ok, moved that part into its own patch. >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c > >> +void __init tegra_init_firmware(void) >> +{ >> + struct device_node *node; >> + >> + if (!of_have_populated_dt()) >> + return; >> + >> + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "tl,trusted-foundations"); >> + if (node && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEGRA_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS)) >> + pr_warn("Trusted Foundations detected but support missing!\n"); >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEGRA_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS) >> + else if (node) >> + register_firmware_ops(&tegra_trusted_foundations_ops); >> +#endif >> +} > > Is it worth continuing on in the node && !IS_ENABLED case here? After > all, we can be pretty certain that the write to the CPU reset vector is > immediately going to trap... That's what was happening until 3.9, but from 3.10 on the trap is apparently handled and the boot completes (although with only one processor). > I suppose that perhaps without SMP, cpuidle, suspend, ... we could keep > running, but that seems a little niche. If we can keep running, even in degraded mode, I see no reason to panic. The problem is well reported in the kernel log, and having a running system might be helpful to analyze the issue. Thanks, Alex.