From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: tegra: set CPU reset handler with firmware op Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:54:59 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1371114745-24710-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1371114745-24710-4-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <51BA1C3D.1010608@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51BA1C3D.1010608-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Joseph Lo , Karan Jhavar , Varun Wadekar , Chris Johnson , Matthew Longnecker , Russell King - ARM Linux , Tomasz Figa , Dave Martin , Jassi Brar , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/13/2013 03:12 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> Use a firmware operation to set the CPU reset handler and only resort to >> doing it ourselves if there is none defined. >> >> This supports the booting of secondary CPUs on devices using a TrustZone >> secure monitor. > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c > >> + err = call_firmware_op(set_cpu_boot_addr, 0, reset_address); >> + switch (err) { >> + case -ENOSYS: >> + tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set(reset_address); >> + /* pass-through */ > > Rather than detecting -ENOSYS and falling back to the custom > tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set(), does it make sense to plug in > tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set as the firmware op when there is no secure > firmware detected? That way, this code wouldn't need the special case; > that would be isolated to firmware.c. Mmmm I admit I just followed what Exynos did without thinking much about it. I don't see any reason why your suggestion wouldn't work, but on second thought tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set() is not a firmware operation - wouldn't it be unexpected (and maybe confusing) to have it called through call_firmware_op()? Alex.