Re: [PATCH v6 03/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-starqltechn: fix usb regulator mistake

[Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@gmail.com>]

пн, 2 дек. 2024 г. в 18:09, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>:
>
> On 2.12.2024 2:41 PM, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> > сб, 26 окт. 2024 г. в 13:41, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>:
> >>
> >> On 8.10.2024 6:51 PM, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> >>> Usb regulator was wrongly pointed to vreg_l1a_0p875.
> >>> However, on starqltechn it's powered from vreg_l5a_0p8.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: d711b22eee55 ("arm64: dts: qcom: starqltechn: add initial device tree for starqltechn")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> I really really doubt that the supplies for on-SoC PHYs were altered,
> >> given these regulators are assigned based on their specific characteristics
> >>
> >
> > From rooted android system from klabit87 on starqltechn:
> >
> > ```
> > starqltechn:/ # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep Hardware
> > Hardware        : Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845
> > starqltechn:/ # uname -a
> > Linux localhost 4.9.186-klabitV6.5 #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 10 19:42:53
> > CST 2020 aarch64
> > starqltechn:/ # cat
> > /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/soc:rpmh-regulator-ldoa1-pm8998_l1/consumers
> > Device-Supply                    EN    Min_uV   Max_uV  load_uA
> > ae90000.qcom,dp_display-vdda-0p9 N     880000   880000        0
> > 1d87000.ufsphy_mem-vdda-phy      Y     880000   880000    62900
> > ae96400.qcom,mdss_dsi_phy0-vdda-0p9 N          0        0        0
> > ae94400.qcom,mdss_dsi_phy0-vdda-0p9 Y     880000   880000    36000
> > 1c00000.qcom,pcie-vreg-0.9       Y     880000   880000    24000
> > pm8998_l1                        N          0        0        0
> > starqltechn:/ # cat
> > /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/soc:rpmh-regulator-ldoa5-pm8998_l5/consumers
> > Device-Supply                    EN    Min_uV   Max_uV  load_uA
> > ae90000.qcom,dp_display-vdda-usb1-ss-core N          0        0        0
> > 88e2000.qusb-vdd                 Y     800000   800000        0
> > 88e8000.ssphy-vdd                Y     800000   800000        0
> > pm8998_l5                        N          0        0        0
> > ```
> >
> > I also downloaded kernel source from Samsung, to check its dts,
> > and it also powers qusb@88e2000 and ssphy@88e8000 from 'pm8998_l5' regulator.
>
> Interesting.. could you try to forcefully shut down L5A (I doubt you'll
> be able to do so with L1A given it powers so much digital logic), or
> set its regulator-min&max-microvolt to a way-too-low voltage (vmin
> seems to be 312000)?
>
> You should then be able to tell fairly easily, depending on whether usb2
> still works after a replug
>

Usb doesn't worked in such experiment:
Here's the log:
```
[    3.541733] ldo5: Setting 312000-312000uV
......
[    3.808224] dwc3 a600000.usb: Adding to iommu group 5
[    3.823116] qcom-qmp-combo-phy 88e8000.phy: phy initialization timed-out
[    3.824323] phy phy-88e8000.phy.0: phy init failed --> -110
[    3.825916] dwc3 a600000.usb: error -ETIMEDOUT: failed to initialize core
[    3.827208] dwc3 a600000.usb: probe with driver dwc3 failed with error -110
[    3.828548] probe of a600000.usb returned 110 after 20399 usecs
```