From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F900C4332F for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 08:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230008AbiJQICw (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 04:02:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50146 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229995AbiJQICv (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 04:02:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B995B795; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id cy15-20020a056830698f00b0065c530585afso5350989otb.2; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:02:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=FfE3up6VgNTTWa9yiUMmzD5AKoPfLVEMcdq8Cdqv3hk=; b=IHUNdKS/DlgIvFA0O/sugHNtql08QxjAMqDfWhpJ2cJAvlpIZ6Sn1jgvgHXJluhwsE SNeRvQG+f+UJJzk/G5tb8FSSOyH8piBsUVbVTA6lwAW5xvtJ+HSDQSvpjqyyuq7PVa8K lNkDAb1knwurPLteSYHsUkgNn4sSH8B08JJcKu6dPJiYTp65osgUABftJbX03LwFpIfN 1GVpvmXGnH1xc0EIWeZWpcqLQOMJS8T2KhkGy7SsKzZod77gZsbJlRZjgiQLdtCO85FT qnI3wkFBgcr95sJTVTuLXzGLahIicWPJL4DCNA6fQyzesHXJkNPfQ4JpbNIzlinQIGRf UEWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FfE3up6VgNTTWa9yiUMmzD5AKoPfLVEMcdq8Cdqv3hk=; b=uTddwf9AhjzyF4gx2yNlakhEmiXsTJMwuKK+YH1t2JYLbGhmjV8p4l/zDpwyDrbriy 5TP9+qrhhKJnnt5Hj6/A9hZx7WD8A1+HXsUQJrRXzGqKlwMfAY6+NcNPRQFNuwrI4+iB InP0Ljiw0HTbIe6CYYQVjYPD6tPnSKUgmRb+nDikmxnFx5+4BejY02wf9oZBdB2YRNFV yV7aVqVixxXueBqW0nvdQD0OOKwSfamFF3TGFCNgin68KxDe1pOENQpUT8T8E3qtmai+ ffv6ZT68IMWh2PhRGdr0gUJ46chvFZOrg0igcm+t9uffS0YT66BKzRKLKrISJbHriMiB OdlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3+K42cz6bv5jbBBI1EkDag5QKI5YYgvPnvd94YpynKTghXncB0 fnD7sGdiU+ex1xdFmzhaNNo1bBwSk3lV6sPVHmY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM52fpVNjwUfJRM6iEkYH9bNJCgCpfMH0xKQqNjH3yGNPUf46nZzC9eyDSBsQi2UTF5KUbOWoAI83lcoR3vg3VM= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7204:0:b0:65e:5e5:310d with SMTP id u4-20020a9d7204000000b0065e05e5310dmr4498939otj.214.1665993769662; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 01:02:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221012185411.1282838-1-dsankouski@gmail.com> <20221012185411.1282838-2-dsankouski@gmail.com> <99652775-8921-9d4a-193e-20d1487e6759@linaro.org> <8c773f11-1c00-1856-daa7-250a4ec37d23@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <8c773f11-1c00-1856-daa7-250a4ec37d23@linaro.org> From: Dzmitry Sankouski Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:02:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: add samsung,starqltechn board based on sdm845 chip To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org =D0=BF=D1=82, 14 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82. 2022 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 19:13, Krzysztof K= ozlowski : > > On 14/10/2022 07:01, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote: > > =D1=87=D1=82, 13 =D0=BE=D0=BA=D1=82. 2022 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 16:43, Krzyszt= of Kozlowski > > : > >> > >> On 12/10/2022 14:54, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote: > >>> Add samsung,starqltechn board (Samsung Galaxy S9) binding. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Dzmitry Sankouski > >>> --- > >>> Changes for v2,v3: none > >> > >> Where is v2 and v3 of this? > > I've been told it's easier for maintainers to resend all patch series, > > even if only 1 patch from the series requires change. So I decided to > > keep versions equal in all patches, to clearly indicate those patches > > are from the same series. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. > > This is okay, but you wrote here there was a v1 and v2, and you changed > nothing against it. If there was v1 and v2, we would ack it, I think. > > Or this changelog is for some other patch? Not for this one? There's no previous versions of this patch, since it was born in the v3 patch series. The empty changelog for this patch indicates that there's no point to look for previous versions. I think I'll do it differently next time to avoid confusion - just a sentence that vN is the start version for patch. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >