From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mailbox: mailbox-test: support single channel with
 separate Tx and Rx buffer
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:01:53 +0530
Message-ID: <CABb+yY20VRzHa540c6guAJS-U3Y5XFCbAYAWwSLT3ugOJRYmfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1455210808-29395-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
	<56C1C1DA.5000207@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <56C1C1DA.5000207@arm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Jassi,
>
> On 11/02/16 17:13, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lee, Jassi,
>>
>> Assuming mailbox-test was designed to be generic, I am trying to extend
>> it to support single channel with separate Tx and Rx buffer. With these
>> changes I am able to test arm_mhu driver. However I couldn't understand
>> the intention of converting buffer to ASCII hex dump in read method.
>> I have a local change to remove that so that it can deal with any data
>> in any format(e.g. some protocol format) and userspace can deal with the
>> actual interpretation of the data. Let me know your thoughts on that.
>>
>
> Can you review this ? It would be good to get this in for v4.6
>
Seems simple enough. So once you and Lee are in sync...