From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Brugger Subject: Re: [PATCH v5' 1/8] ARM: mediatek: Add basic support for mt8127 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:08:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1415086255-5555-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> <1415692428-18416-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> <1415692700.13629.26.camel@mtksdaap41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1415692700.13629.26.camel@mtksdaap41> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yingjoe Chen Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , srv_heupstream , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , HC Yen , Yuhau Chen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Nathan Chung , Sascha Hauer , Kumar Gala , Olof Johansson , huang eddie , Yingjoe Chen List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Joe, 2014-11-11 8:58 GMT+01:00 Yingjoe Chen : > > Hi, Matthias, Arnd, > > After previous discussion[1], I'm not sure which one do you preferred > for mt8127/mt8135, so I send 64bits address version again. Trying to not > SPAM too much, I only send the difference(first 4 patches) this time. > > We do have SoC that need >4GB address, so at least those will need to > use 64bits address. If we want to have a consistent look, 64bits is the > way to go. Also we already have some patches under review now using > 64bits address. So I preferred this one, but both versions are OK to me. Regarding Arnd's last email, the 64 bit is the right way. Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger > > Please help to review this and let me know anything you want me to > change. Thanks. > > Joe.C > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/299598.html > > > -- motzblog.wordpress.com