From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
To: ChiaWei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: "jae.hyun.yoo@intel.com" <jae.hyun.yoo@intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>, Cedric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>,
Haiyue Wang <haiyue.wang@linux.intel.com>,
Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net"
<openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>,
Jenmin Yuan <jenmin_yuan@aspeedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 4/4] ipmi: kcs_bmc_aspeed: add clock control logic
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 03:28:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XesLdb+Cbi3ZYrOahRHbXQi3L=cQXax=RV2=PrjiPQBew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HK0PR06MB3779F8E273396ED805EE5D81918B9@HK0PR06MB3779.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 03:16, ChiaWei Wang <chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jae,
>
> > From: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On
> >
> > From: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > If LPC KCS driver is registered ahead of lpc-ctrl module, LPC KCS block will be
> > enabled without heart beating of LCLK until lpc-ctrl enables the LCLK. This
> > issue causes improper handling on host interrupts when the host sends
> > interrupts in that time frame.
> > Then kernel eventually forcibly disables the interrupt with dumping stack and
> > printing a 'nobody cared this irq' message out.
> >
> > To prevent this issue, all LPC sub drivers should enable LCLK individually so this
> > patch adds clock control logic into the LPC KCS driver.
>
> Have all LPC sub drivers could result in entire LPC block down if any of them disables the clock (e.g. driver unload).
> The LPC devices such as SIO can be used before kernel booting, even without any BMC firmware.
> Thereby, we recommend to make LCLK critical or guarded by protected clock instead of having all LPC sub drivers hold the LCLK control.
>
> The previous discussion for your reference:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/28/153
Please read the entire thread. The conclusion:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACPK8XdBmkhZ8mcSFmDAFV8k7Qj7ajBL8TVKfK8c+5aneUMHZw@mail.gmail.com/
That is, for the devices that have a driver loaded can enable the
clock. When they are unloaded, they will reduce the reference count
until the last driver is unloaded. eg:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/clk/clk.c#L945
There was another fork to the thread, where we suggested that a
protected clocks binding could be added:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/160269577311.884498.8429245140509326318@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com/
If you wish to use this mechanism for eg. SIO clocks, then I encourage
Aspeed to submit a patch to do that.
Cheers,
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-02 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 23:37 [PATCH -next 0/4] Add LCLK control into Aspeed LPC sub drivers jae.hyun.yoo
2021-11-01 23:36 ` Joel Stanley
2021-11-02 12:22 ` Corey Minyard
2021-11-02 16:38 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-03 0:04 ` Zev Weiss
2021-11-03 0:17 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-03 0:30 ` Zev Weiss
2021-11-03 0:54 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-03 1:09 ` Zev Weiss
2021-11-03 15:56 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-04 1:48 ` Zev Weiss
2021-11-04 16:09 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-01 23:37 ` [PATCH -next 1/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: add LCLK setting into LPC IBT node jae.hyun.yoo
2021-11-01 23:33 ` Joel Stanley
2021-11-01 23:48 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-01 23:52 ` Joel Stanley
2021-11-01 23:59 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-02 22:21 ` Andrew Jeffery
2021-11-01 23:37 ` [PATCH -next 2/4] ipmi: bt: add clock control logic jae.hyun.yoo
2021-11-01 23:32 ` Joel Stanley
2021-11-02 9:35 ` Cédric Le Goater
2021-11-02 16:36 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-02 22:14 ` Andrew Jeffery
2021-11-01 23:37 ` [PATCH -next 3/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: add LCLK setting into LPC KCS nodes jae.hyun.yoo
2021-11-01 23:34 ` Joel Stanley
2021-11-02 22:22 ` Andrew Jeffery
2021-11-03 16:15 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-01 23:37 ` [PATCH -next 4/4] ipmi: kcs_bmc_aspeed: add clock control logic jae.hyun.yoo
2021-11-01 23:33 ` Joel Stanley
2021-11-02 3:15 ` ChiaWei Wang
2021-11-02 3:28 ` Joel Stanley [this message]
2021-11-02 16:35 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2021-11-03 1:55 ` ChiaWei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACPK8XesLdb+Cbi3ZYrOahRHbXQi3L=cQXax=RV2=PrjiPQBew@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=chiawei_wang@aspeedtech.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haiyue.wang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jae.hyun.yoo@intel.com \
--cc=jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jenmin_yuan@aspeedtech.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).