From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] gpio: add parameter to allow the use named gpios Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:36:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1420621722-7428-1-git-send-email-oliver+list@schinagl.nl> <1420621722-7428-3-git-send-email-oliver+list@schinagl.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1420621722-7428-3-git-send-email-oliver+list@schinagl.nl> Sender: linux-leds-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Olliver Schinagl , Alexandre Courbot Cc: Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Olliver Schinagl , Robin Gong , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Aaron Lu , Mika Westerberg , Grant Likely , Wolfram Sang , Alexander Shiyan , Jingoo Han , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Input lin List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > From: Olliver Schinagl > > The gpio binding document says that new code should always use named > gpios. Patch 40b73183 added support to parse a list of gpios from child > nodes, but does not make it possible to use named gpios. This patch adds > the con_id property and implements it is done in gpiolib.c, where the > old-style of using unnamed gpios still works. > > Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl Alexandre, can you please take a close look at this patch. Yours, Linus Walleij