devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux
	<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini-9wsNiZum9E8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mach-ux500|nomadik|u300: Align to common DT bindings for mmci
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:00:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYPHkEMBu7KMp25veTfXtpWZOOz39n-+jCZ+hTQMK2=Tw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpJDKXK7siVMnB5umv6PnYAyNmto1yq9unxDaD9BP=oBQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 14 March 2014 11:58, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> On 13 March 2014 18:47, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

>>>> NAK.  These bindings have been documented as being there since March
>>>> 14th 2012, and therefore need to be supported for ever by the driver.
>>>> You can _augment_ the bindings with the generic ones, and change the
>>>> DT files, but you can't remove the parsing of the old property names.
>>>
>>> I was kind of expecting this response. :-)
>>>
>>> So, since we made a mistake about adding these DT bindings we are now
>>> unable to remove them, is there really no way back?
>>>
>>> In this particular case, I am confident that it should be safe to
>>> remove them, but I guess this is more matter of principle, right?
>>
>> I can guarantee that there are no deployed U300, Nomadik or
>> Ux500 systems out there with DTBs deployed in them, and
>> for certain no products. At one point that was the criterion...
>> All setups actually use the appended device tree.
>
> It sure seems like it's safe to remove them.
>
> If you decide to accept the patch, could we queue it through ARM SOC
> with your help Linus? Maybe even for 3.15 as the sooner the better!?

Actually I think I would want some indication from the device tree
maintainers on this. After all they are safeguarding the DT
process.

I am however worried about the lack of response from that camp
at times, this is supposed to be a simple yes/no question :-/

DT folks??

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-17 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-13 12:32 [PATCH] ARM: mach-ux500|nomadik|u300: Align to common DT bindings for mmci Ulf Hansson
     [not found] ` <1394713963-18300-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-13 17:47   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
     [not found]     ` <20140313174703.GO21483-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-14  7:27       ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found]         ` <CAPDyKFrw092mbirDBffF6TraUoXDLh5movp_sf9PYERG88P-Qw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-14 10:58           ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-17 10:01             ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found]               ` <CAPDyKFpJDKXK7siVMnB5umv6PnYAyNmto1yq9unxDaD9BP=oBQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-17 14:00                 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2014-03-17 16:15                   ` Mark Rutland
2014-03-18  8:23                     ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdYPHkEMBu7KMp25veTfXtpWZOOz39n-+jCZ+hTQMK2=Tw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rubini-9wsNiZum9E8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).