From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B0FC432C0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993602072D for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:43:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="XAGbQgf1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726655AbfKVPnZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:43:25 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:40121 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726858AbfKVPnW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:43:22 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id q2so7901030ljg.7 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:43:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GQzy1iQq7/UigF4z8t1UMdfHuT9DigedXPRNYTx8QBY=; b=XAGbQgf1cU8rD/kywGu8E//J0deKp6oSzrY4nW/7iQnOC7Z85qIiCXWxldnCOmfQM0 5rD4pSqDLOxxYiQ22XtpA+ZQtIqNcfUSFvLURlIPtJQVgPu6ai8DLyrFL71pg9GiQ9pG J3lCWTccy2Ay+ptCBd2t+/YVxqaTPHmAVMWaO+1JJ8kbJonQBCsyOGxhUYGEl3GzmSzI ho5z7STf9Rfad2+G+J/cpfc9GQGp4z9GERHGxEaTUbyQm6+2MI6V46dhpZKOLPjpFlk3 RbOEvF5G831FamUvktmD2bDhXniv+mEfiO+c9474NZJJF1jmAgNlIrUF58CkzGAeBa0J jdeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GQzy1iQq7/UigF4z8t1UMdfHuT9DigedXPRNYTx8QBY=; b=UsKxVlCquW91gpUJK+Lnzm8BHC0hcBbnJX4/P98v3NA3aXpt8P+C7kpzUTD0ajFGK1 kO1srRx+FgHPwPCi5EvNMft5mDvls1Yl3e92MitxmFNpHFf3vFMalAVvnMai4xrFcev/ T8bgrfDODGKEeztBSsqUGV1Evj9JQHVmiZx0ng1pdSg1YJN1HEHxFPyjgQ6dAKbaj/uw 9Egc93XY7d4VuXOUArTbXQqf0MBI4A5VsgXXEi1B5U+76oW07eh/xGLBqPdeCAvQ9hxt pwqgOWA3rBp9dpg6MjbQidJkIV6WAet55GPSnbXG4bqZbH7dvp6inW/V5AJdhYlrMbc5 3BbA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXnerVpifPVxSFIVg0G5dIVMi79TedfFXi/SpRMi1+07itNcEk9 SzxK8w0203wgNY93cShVFeUVMogcF3RF5DE2jSHksA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwcugeW4edWhYbow6P3IthY8AWt+/SiEG9o6A9ekVZjqmWysrxtVlxvnwXZwUzSHLS/mgbF3SgO93jwQdxuQ3k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1049:: with SMTP id x9mr536136ljm.233.1574437400356; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:43:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191120181857.97174-1-stephan@gerhold.net> <20191120181857.97174-4-stephan@gerhold.net> <20191122140944.GA2872@gerhold.net> In-Reply-To: <20191122140944.GA2872@gerhold.net> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:43:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document compatibles for Ux500 boards To: Stephan Gerhold Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Linux ARM , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:10 PM Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:22:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:20 PM Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > > > > The device-specific compatible values used by the Ux500 boards > > > were not documented so far. Add a new simple schema to document them. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold > > > > Nice, thanks! > > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > > > I expect Rob to merge these patches as they are bindings-only, > > alternatively I can take them in the Ux500 DTS pull request > > for the next kernel cycle. > > > > For this patch it would be easier if you take it through the Ux500 tree, > as I have another patch series that adds a new board to it. OK I applied it for v5.6 on my ux500-dts branch. > The vendor-prefix patches are independent, so Rob can merge them if that > is easier? Let's see if Rob wants to take them, else I will merge them as well. Yours, Linus Walleij