From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B585CA9EC5 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F60E2087F for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="ise6gsWZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726584AbfJ3Nue (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:50:34 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com ([209.85.167.67]:43570 "EHLO mail-lf1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726246AbfJ3Nue (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:50:34 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id j5so1604495lfh.10 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hKvVM+Lts2ZimWoF8BpQfrXJptOfWTU/76y+dUo91Xg=; b=ise6gsWZjYd+YEvdWj6TeziR+YM/ap5c2m+tbfumbVKlsLneIoCe1NeOSUBSPfrMUZ N/N8xE70oDjDMUbzzc0L5qpmNhiyAWw/JA+P4HFtj0Yr1Om2yid5undvOgXSxfYVhNeU 6d2nOtKI2nVBYIf8hP0DRLolprxmuJQ6E7DtPesVX0HRtIMOseA0JVNyGKxf9qieuu1w LMJ/sQGOmwm8f3x7mAK2e0YXXiOlL3MGOD5h4JioInkefqcKu9qSntkzQaaa/JxpJTfC Rdo6wFTs2A4+zIncrx88AwRkKrfFu+5h5Bq2ib9NalYH5URFOK3upX4tlIXDZGlKM2jj YPPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hKvVM+Lts2ZimWoF8BpQfrXJptOfWTU/76y+dUo91Xg=; b=cW2URhXHWzicWpgoIjr0BnevM3siudS5UK0L82fa18kZxCgMievP1bFPE5t+tt+LL6 2fq6LtJIuABOwSSVGTqU60I4KGbUJNcAgwc6j1SqVQDqp7i4KtvNQ45Bev8mWkCuW8OE OqWr1QLPavm6wKn4a/CpXz4RERkkRl081pUFS1/olqEHhMvnCISPTtQeZwhxD0NDKwI4 sQo4zFmsyoR/UoFH/e0cYqGU/lKpCMoYNdVUDmHdMfhbYl4swfYU1x5QBQIz4zXl7x2b aHjJb6ew+WzO7GUCNYVBkNJ9ZftSdSXSDZhLubKL0r95YMjJiXkDw744zTmOcaKMlLt8 rwpg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtbAlzJMSaxhiaqgceRFO/kyIpXCLqI1Pp10yC4Vv78IBMQHDV eddT1luvA2t3Y8c6uEk51sCVH64uoKXd5FUWA6sZGA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0c7Qf7SbNHkI8EEMumWKBAHA3H3uCgrvSX/PLtGNFb6KJ6a8grwgYyBfTZ+//S8rbMyS5lBXpJRawaWya4YY= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4a8f:: with SMTP id l15mr517648lfp.5.1572443432053; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:50:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191024114305.15581-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <20191025192054.GA7415@bogus> In-Reply-To: <20191025192054.GA7415@bogus> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:50:20 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] drm/panel: Add generic DSI panel YAML bindings To: Rob Herring Cc: Thierry Reding , Sam Ravnborg , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:20 PM Rob Herring wrote: > [Me] > > + dsi-controller@55aa55aa { > > + compatible = "acme,foo"; > > Eventually, I want to start reporting if compatible strings aren't > documented (i.e. matched to a schema). This will break then... OK I drop this. > > + reg = <0x55aa55aa>; > > This will fail because a size cell is expected. Do you mean it will fail the day we actually check reg properties to be properly formed under the circumstances? Because: HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/sony,acx424akp.yaml CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/dsi-controller.yaml SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.yaml (...) It passes just fine. I get a bit nervous since the schema is all about being strict about stuff so I get the feeling that "should have failed". Yours, Linus Walleij