From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: add gpio_export_with_name Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 23:11:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20121121101259.GQ4398@game.jcrosoft.org> <1353492849-29397-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20121126135911.2F1D33E187C@localhost> <51A719A5.50906@epfl.ch> <51A7B8CD.4080702@epfl.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51A7B8CD.4080702-p8DiymsW2f8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Florian Vaussard Cc: "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , Philipp Zabel , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote: > Indeed, I work in a robotics lab :-) One of our board (mach-imx/ > mx31moboard*.c) controls for example the multiplexing of two cameras > sharing the same acquisition bus (I know, a bit hackish). > I developed a similar board with an OMAP3. Such control do not > fit well in the above-mentioned cases, but we do not need RT processes. It does seem to fit well with V4L and/or the media controller framework though, or is this one of those "oh, we don't really like to use V4L so we have this special hack instead" things? Yours, Linus Walleij