From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gpio/omap: force restore if context loss is not detectable Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:44:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1365106576-31816-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1365106576-31816-5-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <5165C086.5010105@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5165C086.5010105@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: Grant Likely , Santosh Shilimkar , Kevin Hilman , device-tree , linux-omap , linux-arm List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 04/10/2013 02:39 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >>> When booting with device-tree the function pointer for detecting context >>> loss is not populated. Ideally, the pm_runtime framework should be >>> enhanced to allow a means for reporting context/state loss and we could >>> avoid populating such function pointers altogether. In the interim until >>> a generic non-device specific solution is in place, force a restore of >>> the gpio bank when enabling the gpio controller. >>> >>> Adds a new device-tree property for the OMAP GPIO controller to indicate >>> if the GPIO controller is located in a power-domain that never loses >>> power and hence will always maintain its logic state. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter >> >> In this case it'd be really helpful to get an ACK from somebody else. >> I have no clue whether this thing is doing what it should, and if >> you were the maintainer I'd apply it but now I'd like to hear from >> Kevin or Santosh first... > > Santosh gave the his ACK for 1-4 (see 0/5) and Kevin added his > reviewed-by for 1-4 (again see 0/5). OK all in patch 0 how confusing #-) All patches applied with Kevin's and Santosh's tags! Yours, Linus Walleij