From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:26:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201306141741.46077.heiko@sntech.de> <201306141742.21808.heiko@sntech.de> <201306161245.30465.heiko@sntech.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201306161245.30465.heiko@sntech.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Heiko_St=FCbner?= Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , James Hogan , Laurent Pinchart List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Heiko St=FCbner wro= te: > Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:26:38 schrieb Linus Walleij: >> Can't we rely on PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE for all this? > > you're the boss on this, I'll do whatever you say :-) Oh that's not good. As can be seen from past experience I am often avoiding to do horrible design mistakes by other smart people telling me how wrong I am ... > Actually I'm too more comfortable with only using bias-disable. > > So I'll redo this patch to remove the disabling of a pull via this me= thod, if > that's the right way to go. I sent some patch on how I'd like it defined, please check it. > Same with the rockchip driver. Hm I merged that patch actually, but you can send a v2 if you want me to replace it. Or a patch on top, if preferred. Yours, Linus Walleij