From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/22] gpio: Probe GPIO drivers on demand Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:01:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1441628627-5143-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <1441628627-5143-6-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1441628627-5143-6-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomeu Vizoso Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Javier Martinez Canillas , Mark Brown , Thierry Reding , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Dmitry Torokhov , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > When looking up a gpiochip through its firmware node, probe it if it > hasn't already. > > The goal is to reduce deferred probes to a minimum, as it makes it very > cumbersome to find out why a device failed to probe, and can introduce > very big delays in when a critical device is probed. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso > --- > > Changes in v4: None > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: None Acked-by: Linus Walleij That is if the whole thing goes in as-is for the GPIO parts. Yours, Linus Walleij