From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: meson: Add drive-strength property Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:42:03 +0700 Message-ID: References: <20190314163725.7918-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <20190314163725.7918-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <20190330212830.GA28281@bogus> <722ef39685fb3b519d09c00a3444708abd685f9d.camel@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <722ef39685fb3b519d09c00a3444708abd685f9d.camel@baylibre.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jerome Brunet Cc: Rob Herring , Kevin Hilman , Guillaume La Roque , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 2:04 PM Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Sun, 2019-03-31 at 01:40 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 05:37:24PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > > From: Guillaume La Roque > > > +Optional properties : > > > + - drive-strength: Drive strength for the specified pins in uA. > > > > The standard definition says this is in mA. > > Yes, the problem we have and the solutions we are thinking about are explained > in detail in the cover letter of this patchset. Could you share your opinion > on it ? I like your idea with drive-strength-uA but I need the second opinion from the device tree people. Yours, Linus Walleij