From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / GPIO: Driver GPIO mappings for ACPI GPIOs Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:58:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2758495.RYBbleVHkC@vostro.rjw.lan> <1433051.htaUTMPMBY@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1433051.htaUTMPMBY@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Mika Westerberg , Arnd Bergmann , Alexandre Courbot , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Grant Likely , ACPI Devel Maling List , Aaron Lu , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Darren Hart , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, November 03, 2014 02:22:10 PM Linus Walleij wrote: >> With that change: >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > OK, made the changes and added your Reviewed-by. > > One semi-related question though. Alexandre ACKed the patch before, so > what did that mean from the GPIO subsystem's perspective? Was the patch > approved, not approved, semi-approved? It just means we are not always entirely aligned, it's not like Alexandre and I have meetings on the side and decide what to say, it's just these mails. I do trust him, I wouldn't get mad if it had been merged just wanted some polishing when I could get it... Yours, Linus Walleij