From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] soc/tegra: pmc: Use BIT macro for register field definition Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:44:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1460473007-11535-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1460473007-11535-2-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <20160412152642.GA30211@ulmo.ba.sec> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160412152642.GA30211@ulmo.ba.sec> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Laxman Dewangan , Stephen Warren , Alexandre Courbot , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Jon Hunter , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > Does this matter at all? We use the explicit notation in quite a number > of places and it works great. I'd like to avoid needless churn unless > there is a very good reason to switch. I am softly enforcing in the GPIO subsystem because I think it's a great perceptual aid, I can skim code faster if this is used, easier for the brain to handle and thus simplifies maintenance. Others may disagree on its virtues. It is not a subjective opinion, but proving the point needs perceptual psychology research. Yours, Linus Walleij