From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] pinctrl: samsung: Usability and extensibiltiy improvements Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1349685556-23718-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1349685556-23718-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa , Thomas Abraham Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > This patch series is a work on improving usability and extensibiltiy of the > pinctrl-samsung driver. It consists of three main parts: > - moving SoC-specific data to device tree > - converting the driver to use one GPIO chip and one IRQ domain per pin bank > - introducing generic wake-up interrupt capability description So can you prepare a patch series which does all but the first bullet to begin with, and a SoC-and register offset patch on top of that as a separate series, because it is controversial? I don't like that these two things are mingled together like this in an all-or-nothing manner. So I'm OK with a patch series for bulle (2) and (3) but not (1). And I'd like to have Thomas A:s ACK on the series too. Yours, Linus Walleij