From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Arend van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Johannes Berg"
<johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Martin Blumenstingl"
<martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>,
"Felix Fietkau" <nbd-Vt+b4OUoWG0@public.gmane.org>,
"Arend van Spriel"
<arend-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 23:16:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACna6rx5fMFVyjB=4=ZeXhfXWGPQmKiEQuJRY+mz2OFMLYx_HA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e194b980-1048-8da6-624b-26f824ff655d-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On 2 January 2017 at 21:12, Arend van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 02-01-17 18:52, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> +static void wiphy_freq_limits_apply(struct wiphy *wiphy)
>> [...]
>>> + if (!wiphy_freq_limits_valid_chan(wiphy,
>>> chan)) {
>>> + pr_debug("Disabling freq %d MHz as
>>> it's out of OF limits\n",
>>> + chan->center_freq);
>>> + chan->flags |=
>>> IEEE80211_CHAN_DISABLED;
>>
>> I think you didn't address the problem in the best way now.
>>
>> The problem with the channel sharing was the way you're applying the
>> limits - at runtime. This is now OK since the new function shouldn't be
>> called when the channel structs are shared, but hooking it all into thes
>> regulatory code is now no longer needed.
>>
>> What you can do now, when reading the OF data, is actually apply it to
>> the channel flags immediately. If done *before* wiphy_register(), these
>> flags will be preserved forever, so you no longer need any hooks in
>> regulatory code at all - you can just set the original channel flags
>> according to the OF data.
>
> I suppose this then can also be done early in the wiphy_register()
> function itself, right?
When driver calls wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory I need to already have
limits read from the DT (at least in my current implementation, it may
change, but I need help understanding flow first). As
wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory has to be called before wiphy_register,
I can't read DT so late (in wiphy_register).
--
Rafał
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-02 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-02 16:32 [PATCH V3 1/2] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <20170102163209.2445-1-zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-02 16:32 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] cfg80211: support ieee80211-freq-limit DT property Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <20170102163209.2445-2-zajec5-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-02 17:52 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1483379548.15591.1.camel-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-02 20:12 ` Arend van Spriel
[not found] ` <e194b980-1048-8da6-624b-26f824ff655d-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-02 22:16 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2017-01-03 7:00 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-02 22:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
[not found] ` <CACna6ryrYY5G=Fvmsrq_sD3iX5dWreyz7R8mGEd6ogUck=twnQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-03 7:06 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-02 16:32 ` [PATCH V3 3/2] brcmfmac: use wiphy_read_of_freq_limits to get extra limits Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACna6rx5fMFVyjB=4=ZeXhfXWGPQmKiEQuJRY+mz2OFMLYx_HA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=zajec5-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arend-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arend.vanspriel-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nbd-Vt+b4OUoWG0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rafal-g1n6cQUeyibVItvQsEIGlw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).