From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: remove /proc/device-tree Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:16:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1363791074-16415-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <1363791074-16415-3-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> <1363791479.12701.9.camel@pasglop> <1363839594.17680.19.camel@pasglop> <1363851836.17680.20.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1363851836.17680.20.camel@pasglop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree-discuss , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , "David S. Miller" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 07:35 +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >> > Shouldn't we have the symlink just be a config option itself ? >> > Eventually distros might want get rid of it completely .. >> >> Why? It is the cheapest thing in the world and it means the ABI >> doesn't change at all. > > It's also gross and forces sysfs to remain in /sys which isn't a kernel > enforced policy afaik. Documentation/sysfs-rules.txt, Line 30 g.