Rob, seeing as we disagree on patch #5, do you have time to discuss this evening, or tomorrow?

g.

On 12 Nov 2014 14:56, "Grant Likely" <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
[Replying on-list and with original ccs]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/11/2014 10:42 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> - clocks : List of clocks used by the framebuffer. Clocks listed here
>>            are expected to already be configured correctly. The OS must
>>            ensure these clocks are not modified or disabled while the
>>            simple framebuffer remains active.
>
> Updated in my local tree, where I've also added proper commit messages
> to the 2 patches missing them. Shall I send a v5 of the set, and may I
> add your Acked-by to this patch when sending v5?

For this whole series, please add my Acked-by.

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

I'm okay with the bindings, and I'm okay with adding the clock
dependency to a simplefb node. I'm happy with the conversation we had
today on IRC, and I'm expecting to see a binding that covers expected
firmware/OS behaviour and association with the real hardware posted to
the list shortly.

g.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.