From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: irq domain: defer of irq ressoure resolve
 at platform_drv_probe
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:46:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CACxGe6vG0z0G9Lf2Vof5fWsQXNUT+=p_FTbAtKTALNYVZW=+zw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130528145219.GA30411@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <1369753729-12997-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
 <1369753729-12997-3-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
 <20130529224814.3F8F53E16F4@localhost>
 <20130530103639.GD19834@game.jcrosoft.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130530103639.GD19834-RQcB7r2h9QmfDR2tN2SG5Ni2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/devicetree-discuss>,
 <mailto:devicetree-discuss-request-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:devicetree-discuss-request-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss>,
 <mailto:devicetree-discuss-request-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
Sender: "devicetree-discuss"
 <devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>, Ralf Baechle <ralf-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
<plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 23:48 Wed 29 May     , Grant Likely wrote:
>> Also, if the table has already been populated successfully, then that
>> should be checked for. That would prevent the same table from being
>> parsed over and over in the case of a device that keeps getting
>> deferred.
>
> can I add a new boolean for this in pdev of device_node?

Try it out and see what it looks like. It would probably be better to
have it as a flag in the platform device itself. Regardless, do it as
a follow-on patch so that the functionality can be split from the
optimization change. I think the optimization could still require a
few iterations.

g.