From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Call for testing: device nodes as kobjects Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:20:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20130417171618.GW1906@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130417171618.GW1906-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Stephen Rothwell , devicetree-discuss , David Miller , Michal Simek List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 04:48:22PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Could I get some testing support please? I've applied the patch that >> makes device nodes into kobjects into the following branch and build >> tested it on a bunch of platforms. What I need now is boot testing on >> different architectures. >> >> If you can build this tree and make sure it doesn't break your >> platforms with OF support I would greatly appreciate it. >> >> Also, if you turn off CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE, a symlink will be >> created to the /sys/firmware representation which should be >> functionally identical. For those of you using tools that read >> /proc/device-tree (like kexec), I would also appreciate if you can >> test that those tools still work with CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE turned >> off. >> >> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux devicetree/experimental > > I gave it a quick test on i.MX53 (qsb) and i.MX27 (phycore i.MX27). > Both seem to work just normally. I also made a > > diff -urN /proc/device-tree /sys/firmware/ofw/device-tree > > with CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE enabled (so no symlink). Indeed both > trees are identical. > > So: > > Tested-by: Sascha Hauer Great, thanks! g.