From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27899C433FE for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 01:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238867AbhLOB24 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:28:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43786 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235593AbhLOB2z (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:28:55 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E42FC061574 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:28:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id i5-20020a05683033e500b0057a369ac614so22988462otu.10 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:28:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:user-agent:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=vsh1MhG90sktMnN9grpR54l4uKx6Z6N5tsDDxbZW6o0=; b=JGU0cApMNO/QObrJvFbIIED25d0QAjNji23cp4HxXLFGTpEnaeb2d947VuokTPrJh4 GxqIDaSVHw/ZVrgLLUJ36p6hc4fc2Ao3NBWHZY9233yxuiRmSq0+VA+k2c7w+AK1ethh pIXA/919loix9H/jY9SRtqVmU7bJ5WRstSyhE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :user-agent:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vsh1MhG90sktMnN9grpR54l4uKx6Z6N5tsDDxbZW6o0=; b=cTAebQEqaWkL8y50chzE/Rm9tyZsSv5Sec+lzAFa6ddO44RjgutnciczOxnlxfnKJy pjxM+PgtQD5Ev6LM53h+Efu4JkTvGEt5ZDcTEhGsR7gdqmfr+r65Z0KMaPBayDqplY84 pvxmnkUyvq5taHEdh9FEifWr1Sq35Dkd/W1jhzyVKukhkuZ7oeFIMBelPTbJSqnRgVqu 5RNOo40JWHhC+Di0pnTXX9ZACrhblhsvHU/sJGsvJoNi0QNJfyi8C/BYdr4I4DUQwAab SgQGOX9SWDnOOptDfeR/j1v4A/MJHBdAFeJ/Y0uYgDR0tIZt1jpZTQZ0FedhDah5OnAD wShg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533d3BZgQLM99mruNZtEvJpD1q2ov4LTRYytQqceTExzU3xRRf3L lgUybHxeV83iHdNwm9jQII6sryE9y91aN2JdwIChdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVvIEVSzGWkZ6r6tum5sN5c25e8CxEhW4XCE5QW3Fp24XzJo9z3AmfNkACncaxRnmD6mxorka5IqffVKX3Lug= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:70ce:: with SMTP id w14mr6875613otj.77.1639531734897; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:28:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:28:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1638891339-21806-1-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> References: <1638891339-21806-1-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: alot/0.9.1 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:28:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add pin control support for lpass sc7280 To: Linus Walleij , Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu , agross@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, bgoswami@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, judyhsiao@chromium.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, plai@codeaurora.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, rohitkr@codeaurora.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, tiwai@suse.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2021-12-07 07:35:34) > This patch series is to split lpass variant common pin control > functions and SoC specific functions and to add lpass sc7280 pincontrol support. > It also Adds dt-bindings for lpass sc7280 lpass lpi pincontrol. What ensures that the LPI pins are being muxed out on the pads of the SoC? There's the eGPIO support in the tlmm driver, which seems to let us override the LPI pins and mux them away from this pinctrl device to the tlmm pinctrl device. Should this driver be requesting gpios from tlmm and making sure they're not muxed away to tlmm so we don't have conflicts?